British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> HM Attorney General v Bruce [2006] UKEAT 0586_05_1204 (12 April 2006)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2006/0586_05_1204.html
Cite as: [2006] UKEAT 0586_05_1204, [2006] UKEAT 586_5_1204
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
| At the Tribunal | |
Before
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE LANGSTAFF
MS B SWITZER
MR S YEBOAH
HER MAJESTY’S ATTORNEY GENERAL APPLICANT
MR V BRUCE RESPONDENT
| APPLICANT | |
| RESPONDENT |
Transcript of Proceedings
JUDGMENT
APPLICATION FOR A STAY OF THE ORDER OF THE EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL SEALED ON THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2006
- An Order once made should remain in force unless there is a good reason why it should be stayed. None is advanced. Nor can one be implied purely from the declaration by the respondent that he intends to appeal our decision.
- If he succeeds in obtaining permission from the Court of Appeal he may invite that Court to consider staying our order. If he applies and fails there is no good reason for us to stay our order.
- The logic of our decision is that the respondent should not be able to institute fresh proceedings without leave. This does not prevent him from seeking permission to appeal our order.