At the Tribunal | |
Before
HIS HONOUR JUDGE PETER CLARK
MR P R A JACQUES CBE
MRS D M PALMER
APPELLANT | |
RESPONDENT |
Transcript of Proceedings
JUDGMENT
Revised
For the Appellant | MR I WRIGHT (of Counsel) Instructed by: Ormerods Solicitors Green Dragon House 64-70 High Street Croydon Surrey CR0 9XN |
For the Respondent | MS P HOWE (of Counsel) Instructed by: Warner Goodman & Streat Solicitors 8/9 College Place London Road Southampton SO15 2FF |
JUDGE PETER CLARK
The Facts
The Appeal
(1) Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law in finding that the Appellant was dismissed by reason of redundancy. Was it a genuine redundancy?
(2) Whether the Tribunal ignored the absence of any evidence of proper consultation.
(3) Whether the Tribunal similarly ignored the absence of any evidence of a proper selection procedure
It is convenient to deal with each of those points in turn.
Redundancy
Consultation
Selection
Conclusion