At the Tribunal | |
Before
HIS HONOUR JUDGE J R REID QC
MRS A GALLICO
MR D A C LAMBERT
APPELLANT | |
RESPONDENT |
Transcript of Proceedings
JUDGMENT
PRELIMINARY HEARING – EX PARTE
For the Appellant | MR NICHOLAS BOOTH (of Counsel) Appearing under the Employment Law Appeal Advice Scheme |
JUDGE REID QC: This is a preliminary hearing ex parte on an appeal by Mr Hafele, who was the applicant below, against a decision of an Employment Tribunal sitting at London (South) on 6th and 22nd May 2000. The decision was entered in the Register and copies sent to the parties on 25th May 2000. By that decision, which was unanimous, the tribunal dismissed the complaint by Mr Hafele that his dismissal by the respondent company, Axus UK, was unfair.
"You will normally be based in Uxbridge.
You should live within a reasonable travelling distance from your area or place of work. If you are a Field Based employee, you will be assigned a normal area of work. The company reserves the right to transfer your base or area of work within a reasonable distance and with reasonable notice."
"10. … The Applicant's case is that he appealed against the warning. In the course of these proceedings he produced a letter which is said to have been a letter of appeal. The Respondents deny that they ever received that letter, although it is accepted that there was a meeting on 10 March between the Applicant and Mr Stephen Armstrong, who was at that time the Respondents' Operations Director. …"