British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >>
King v. TG Holdcroft (Holdings) Ltd [2000] EAT 1023_99_1210 (12 October 2000)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2000/1023_99_1210.html
Cite as:
[2000] EAT 1023_99_1210
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
|
|
BAILII case number: [2000] EAT 1023_99_1210 |
|
|
Appeal No. EAT/1023/99 |
EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
|
At the Tribunal |
|
On 12 October 2000 |
Before
HIS HONOUR JUDGE J R REID QC
MR P R A JACQUES CBE
MR J C SHRIGLEY
MR M J KING |
APPELLANT |
|
T G HOLDCROFT (HOLDINGS) LTD |
RESPONDENT |
Transcript of Proceedings
JUDGMENT
PRELIMINARY HEARING – EX PARTE
© Copyright 2000
APPEARANCES
For the Appellant |
MR RICHARD LEIPER (of Counsel) Messrs Tinsdills Solicitors Chichester House 14 Broad Street Hanley Stoke-on-Trent ST1 4EU
|
|
|
JUDGE REID QC: This is an ex parte preliminary hearing to determine whether or not Mr King's appeal against a decision of an Employment Tribunal sitting at Shrewsbury should go to a full hearing.
- For these purposes all that is necessary to say is that the tribunal decided that Mr King was constructively dismissed, but it nonetheless dismissed his claim for compensation for wrongful dismissal for reasons set out in the decision.
- Thereafter the tribunal had second thoughts about its decision and the dismissal of the claim for wrongful dismissal and considered whether it could review its decision. It decided that it could not do so.
- In our view, the papers make it clear that there is a point which, to put it at its lowest, is capable of very serious argument. The matter should therefore, in our view, go to a full hearing, if, which may be doubtful, that is necessary.
- It may be that on this point the respondents to the appeal will take the view that if the other matters stay as they are, this particular appeal should not be resisted, but that is a matter for them.