At the Tribunal | |
Before
HIS HONOUR JUDGE PETER CLARK
MR L D COWAN
LORD GLADWIN OF CLEE CBE JP
APPELLANT | |
RESPONDENT |
Transcript of Proceedings
JUDGMENT
Revised
For the Appellant | MR D CARRINGTON (of Counsel) Civil Rights (UK) The Legal Consultancy 1st Floor Mandela Rooms New Justice House 411A Brixton Road London SW9 8DG |
For the Respondents | MR K J CADOO (Employment Law Consultant) Chestnut Cottage Boughton Malherbe Maidstone Kent ME17 2BD |
First, at pages 12 to 13 of the EAT bundle is a document headed "Request of Adjournment" and purportedly signed by Sharon Jones and dated 9 March 1998. Ms Jones represented Mr Williams at the start of this Tribunal hearing but withdrew on the first morning. A question has arisen as to the authenticity of that document and, in particular, whether it was put before the Tribunal on the first day of the hearing, 9 March 1998 by Ms Jones.
In these circumstances we require an affidavit from Sharon Jones within the next 28 days, deposing as to the genuineness of that document and dealing with the question as to whether or not she says that she handed it to the Tribunal on 9 March 1998.The next matter is that a dispute has arisen over the status of certain statements, purportedly made by clients of the Respondent in relation to the Appellant. Again, we are told by Mr Cadoo that those documents formed part of the Respondent's bundle before the Tribunal. Copies of those documents should be submitted in bundle form to the Tribunal for our use within 28 days.
Finally, at the start of this hearing Mr Carrington applied for an adjournment of the appeal hearing, so that he could have an opportunity to listen to tape recordings of certainly four days of the proceedings before the Employment Tribunal. We refused that application at the start of the day. However, for quite different reasons this appeal hearing has not been completed today.
We make no further order in relation to those tapes, no order having been made at the preliminary hearing by Judge Altman's Tribunal. If the Appellant or his representatives have an opportunity to listen to the tape and wish to rely upon any part of the tape recording or any transcript of those tapes, then application should be made in writing to me for further directions in relation to those tape recordings and their use at this resumed appeal hearing, not less than 21 days before the date fixed for the resumed hearing. As to that resumed hearing, it will be listed for one full day before the same Tribunal sitting today.