British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >>
Akinoshun v. Shaftesbury Housing Group [1999] UKEAT 443_99_2307 (23 July 1999)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1999/443_99_2307.html
Cite as:
[1999] UKEAT 443_99_2307
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
|
|
BAILII case number: [1999] UKEAT 443_99_2307 |
|
|
Appeal No. EAT/443/99 |
EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
|
At the Tribunal |
|
On 23 July 1999 |
Before
HIS HONOUR JUDGE D M LEVY QC
MRS J M MATTHIAS
MR S M SPRINGER MBE
MR A AKINOSHUN |
APPELLANT |
|
SHAFTESBURY HOUSING GROUP |
RESPONDENT |
Transcript of Proceedings
JUDGMENT
PRELIMINARY HEARING
© Copyright 1999
APPEARANCES
For the Appellant |
MR D GREENE (of Counsel) APPEARING UNDER EMPLOYMENT LAW APPEAL ADVICE SCHEME (ELAAS) |
|
|
JUDGE LEVY: This is a preliminary hearing of the appeal by Mr A Akinoshun, the Appellant, following a hearing before a Tribunal sitting at London South on 10 November 1998. The decision was promulgated on 13 January 1999. The question before the Tribunal was whether the Appellant had been unfairly discriminated against on the grounds of sex. His claim failed and was dismissed. There was a further claim that he was not paid less than female workers on the grounds of sex. His claim under the Equal Pay Act also failed and dismissed.
- The Appellant put in a lengthy Notice of Appeal which we have considered with Mr Greene who appears for him on the ELAAS scheme today - the Appellant represented himself below. Mr Green has persuaded us that there are two points which arise on the appeal which are not identified in the Appellant's Notice of Appearance. They really arise because of the red circling of the comparator as against the Appellant.
- Mr Greene has submitted a draft of a Notice of Appeal taking the points which we think are arguable as two grounds. We will give the Appellant leave to amend his Notice of Appeal by withdrawing all the matters which were there before it and to substitute the two grounds which Mr Greene has drafted this morning. It may be that Mr Greene would like to do a little fine tuning to those grounds. We therefore give 14 days in which this should happen and the matter can then come forward for a hearing before a full Tribunal in due course. Category C, estimated time half a day.