At the Tribunal | |
Before
HIS HONOUR JUDGE PETER CLARK
MRS D M PALMER
MR G H WRIGHT MBE
APPELLANT | |
RESPONDENT |
Transcript of Proceedings
JUDGMENT
Revised
For the Appellant | No appearance |
HIS HONOUR JUDGE PETER CLARK
"However, the respondent did not warn or consult reasonably and if the matter was left there, the applicant's dismissal would have been procedurally fair. However, we find that even if reasonable consultation had taken place it would have made no difference to the decision. In so far as that consultation would we find have reasonably been of about two weeks duration, that period was subsumed within the period of the two meetings which took place with the applicant in early February and a letter of dismissal dated 26th February 1999".