At the Tribunal
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE HOLLAND
MR J H GALBRAITH CB
MRS M T PROSSER
JUDGMENT
Revised
APPEARANCES
For the Appellant MR PAUL ROSE
(of Counsel)
Ms Caroline Walker
Messrs Lovell White Durrant
(Solicitors)
65 Holborn Viaduct
London EC1A 2DY
MR JUSTICE HOLLAND: We have before us a preliminary hearing in an appeal mounted by Mars (UK) Ltd, the original Respondent, against a finding of an industrial tribunal sitting at Reading in August 1995, which decision was as follows:
"The respondents unlawfully discriminated against the applicant contrary to the Race Relations Act 1976."
The reasons for that decision in extended form being sent to the parties on 20 September 1995.
The notice of appeal raises seven grounds of appeal but in his submissions to us this morning Mr Rose helpfully curtailed the argument to two grounds and submitted to us that those grounds had sufficient prima facie strength to warrant a full hearing with the Respondent, the original Applicant, present. Having considered his submissions we agree with him and so that this matter will go forward for a full hearing.
However, we make the following directions: first, we direct that a revised notice of appeal be drafted and served on the Tribunal and on the Respondent within, subject to Mr Rose's submissions, the next 14 days. That revised notice of appeal to set out simply the two points that Mr Rose has taken before us today, so that the remaining luggage, if one may so describe it without disrespect to the draftsman, can be eliminated from the further consideration of this appeal. Second, we direct that the Chairman's notes be transcribed and be provided to the parties and to the Tribunal for use at the full hearing.