Reduction of Preferences granted by means of Interposed Persons.
Gardiner v. Laird of Lag
Date: 28 June 1688 Case No. No 166.
A party disponed to an interposed person, who gave a backbond. The interposed person found interpelled from giving preferences, by an inhibition, not against himself, but against his author.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
One Kirkpatrick having disponed his lands irredeemably to Lag, who obliged himself, by a backbond, to denude upon payment of sums advanced and to be advanced by him, and of debts he should acquire; a creditor of the disponer inhibited him, and comprised the backbond; Lag, in a pursuit for mails and duties, craving to be preferred for some debts he had acquired, it was alleged for the other, That the acquisition was a gratification, being posterior to his inhibition.
Alleged for Lag:—That he being impowered by the backbond to acquire debt was not concerned in the inhibition, it not being execute against him, or intimated to him before the acquisition; nor yet being duly registrate, but was registrate by a clerk that was deprived.
Answered: An execution of the inhibition against the debtor was sufficient to hinder gratification by him, or by any interposed person; and in so far as the backbond was for the debtor's behoof, Lag was a confident interposed person; and if it were otherwise, the act might be eluded by backbonds requiring no registration. 2do, Gratification may sometimes be hindered by diligence that cannot formally affect the subject; and it may be debated, if the registration of inhibition quoad the point of gratification, be more necessary than the registration of horning; but here Lag was put in mala fide, to prefer, by registration of the inhibition; and esto the clerk was deprived, yet he was habite and repute clerk, and had the books in his custody.
Replied: The inconveniency of backbonds might indeed be considerable in personal or redeemable rights; but Lag's right was irredeemable, as it stood in the register. 2do, Not only was the clerk deposed, but another did actually exerce the office for some years before the registration.
The Lords sustained the inhibition relevant to hinder gratification made by Lag, after the inhibition execute against Kirkpatrick.
Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 80. Harcarse, (Alienation.) No 154. p. 34.
