British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
Northern Ireland - Social Security and Child Support Commissioners' Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
Northern Ireland - Social Security and Child Support Commissioners' Decisions >>
[2005] NISSCSC C6/04-05(IB) (25 January 2005)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/nie/cases/NISSCSC/2005/C6_04_05(IB).html
Cite as:
[2005] NISSCSC C6/4-5(IB),
[2005] NISSCSC C6/04-05(IB)
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
Decision No: C6/04-05(IB)
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NORTHERN IRELAND) ACT 1992
SOCIAL SECURITY (NORTHERN IRELAND) ORDER 1998
INCAPACITY BENEFIT
Appeal to a Social Security Commissioner
on a question of law from a Tribunal's decision
dated 16 December 2003
DECISION OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSIONER
- This is an appeal by the claimant, with my leave,
against a decision of the appeal tribunal sitting at Craigavon on
16 December 2003 ("the appeal tribunal"). For the reasons which I
give, that decision is erroneous in point of law. I therefore set it aside and
refer the case to a differently constituted tribunal ("the new tribunal") for
rehearing.
- The new tribunal should conduct a complete rehearing
of the appeal.
- The question for determination by the appeal
tribunal was whether the claimant was able to satisfy the personal capability
assessment and thereby show that he was incapable of work. In order to
succeed, he had to qualify for the appropriate number of points, as provided
for in the schedule to the Social Security (Incapacity for Work) (General)
Regulations (Northern Ireland) 1995. The appeal tribunal decided that he
did not satisfy the personal capability assessment and dismissed his appeal.
- I can deal with the matter quite shortly and without
going into the facts. When granting permission to appeal I said that I did so
for the following reasons:
"The applicant's sole ground of appeal is that, having asked for an oral
hearing, he never received notification of the date on which his appeal was
due to be heard. Consequently he did not attend the hearing by the tribunal.
The Department has produced a copy of an undated letter, addressed to the
applicant at his home address, informing him that his appeal was due to be
heard on 16 December 2003 at 2.20 pm. The applicant's case is
that he never received a letter.
Save that there is a section for "Date issued" against which has been
written "2/12/03", posting of the letter has not been proved. So far as I am
aware, there is no evidence which proves its receipt by the applicant.
In these circumstances it is arguable that the appeal should be allowed and
the matter remitted to a new tribunal for a complete rehearing."
- The Decision Making Services of the Department for
Social Development have lodged helpful and carefully researched submissions
which accept the error of law which I have identified and submit that the case
should be remitted for a complete rehearing. Reliance is placed on
paragraphs 10 and 13 of decision CIB/303/1999, a decision of
Mr Commissioner Rowland in Great Britain. I accept those
submissions and accordingly allow the appeal. That I do so is, of course, no
reflection on the appeal tribunal which would not have been aware of the fact
that the claimant had not received notice of the hearing.
(Signed): J P Powell
Deputy Commissioner
25 January 2005