Morfits Six Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2006] UKVAT V19518 (04 April 2006)
Rule 26(2)
MANCHESTER TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: MAN/05/0520
MORFITS SIX LIMITED Appellant
and
THE COMMISSIONERS FOR
HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS Respondents
Tribunal Chairman: Colin Bishopp
Sitting in public in Birmingham on the 29 March 2006
DIRECTION
under Rule 30(8)
This appeal against a decision of the Respondents with respect to a surcharge assessment dated the 11 February 2005 in the sum of £25,462.12 and being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day
And upon hearing Mr R Mansell of the Solicitor's office of HM Revenue and Customs for the Respondents and no one appearing for the Appellant
And this tribunal having heard this appeal under rule 26(2) of the said Rules and having announced its decision
And the Respondents by their said representative stating pursuant to the rule 30(8) of the said Rules as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with rule 30(1) of the said Rules
This tribunal finds that the Appellant does not have a reasonable excuse for the default which resulted in the Respondents making the assessment under appeal since its reliance on third parties is excluded from being a reasonable excuse by section 71(1)(b) of the Value Added Tax Act 1994
And this tribunal directs that this appeal is dismissed and that there is to be no direction as to costs
COLIN BISHOPP
CHAIRMAN
Release Date: 4 April 2006
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2006