United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions

---

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Taipan Taverns Ltd v Revenue and Customs [2006] UKVAT V19487 (06 March 2006)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2006/V19487.html
Cite as: [2006] UKVAT V19487

---

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]

---

Taipan Taverns Ltd v Revenue and Customs [2006] UKVAT V19487 (06 March 2006)

 


19487

LONDON TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: LON/2005/1183

Copy sent to:

Appellant/Applicant

Respondents

TAIPAN TAVERNS LTD Appellant

- and -

THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS Respondents

Tribunal: STEPHEN OLIVER QC (Chairman)

RUTH WATTS DAVIES

Sitting in public in London on 1 March 2006

DIRECTION

under Rule 30(8)

THIS APPEAL against a decision of the Respondents with respect to a Default Surcharge being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day

AND UPON HEARING Alan Murray, chief financial officer, for the Appellant and Pauline Crinnion for the Respondents

AND THIS TRIBUNAL having heard this appeal and having announced its decision

AND THE parties present at the hearing by their said representatives stating pursuant to Rule 30(8) of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with Rule 30(1) of the said Rules

THIS TRIBUNAL FINDS THAT there was a reasonable excuse for the late payment of the "payments on account" due on 30 June and 29 July 2005. The Appellant was in all the circumstances, entitled to assume that its bank would comply with the terms of their CHAPS agreement. But there was not a reasonable excuse for the late payment of the "balancing payment" due on 31 August 2005. The Appellant had been duly notified that the 7 days of grace was not available to taxpayers on the payments on account regime

AND THIS TRIBUNAL DIRECTS THAT this appeal is ALLOWED in relation to the payments on account but DISMISSED in relation to the balancing payment

AND that there is to be no direction as to costs

STEPHEN OLIVER QC

Chairman

Release Date: 6 March 2006

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2006