If you found BAILII useful today, could you please make a contribution?
Your donation will help us maintain and extend our databases of legal information. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month donates, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
Sentinal Lifts Ltd v Customs and Excise [2004] UKVAT V18691 (09 July 2004)
18691
LONDON TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: LON/2004/0222
Copy sent to:
Appellant/Applicant
Respondents
- and -
THE COMMISSIONERS OF CUSTOMS AND EXCISE Respondents
Tribunal: MALCOLM J F PALMER (Chairman)
Sitting in public in London on 23 June 2004
DIRECTION
under Rule 30(8)
THIS APPEAL against a decision of the Respondents with respect to a Default Surcharge of £609.75 in respect of the period ended 31 December 2002 being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day
AND UPON HEARING Mr G Redwood, Managing Director, for the Appellant and Mr A Dougal, Advocate, for Customs and Excise
AND THE parties present at the hearing by their said representative(s) stating pursuant to Rule 30(8) of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with Rule 30(1) of the said Rules
THIS TRIBUNAL FINDS THAT it is satisfied that the accident to Mrs Redwood gave the Appellant a reasonable excuse for the insufficiency of funds that lead to the default
AND THIS TRIBUNAL DIRECTS THAT this appeal be ALLOWED
AND that there is to be no direction as to the costs