Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)

---

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> Harron v Information Commissioner and Rotherham MBKC (Information rights: practice and procedure, Tribunal procedure and practice - tribunal jurisdiction) [2024] UKUT 275 (AAC) (05 September 2024)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2024/275.html
Cite as: [2024] UKUT 275 (AAC)

---

[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

---

Harron v Information Commissioner and Rotherham MBKC [2024] UKUT 275 (AAC) (5 September 2024)

First-tier Tribunal (FTT) struck out appeal on basis that it had no jurisdiction under rule 8(2) of the FTT (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules - neither respondent seeking strike out of the whole appeal on this basis - discusses what FTT's `jurisdiction' means in this context - appeal allowed as FTT had not read properly and fully the Notice of Appeal and therefore decided its lack of jurisdiction on an incomplete and wrong basis - properly construed, the FTT had jurisdiction to determine the appeal- strike out applications remitted to a new FTT to decide if instead the appeal should be struck out on the basis that it has no reasonable prospect of success.

A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2024] UKUT 275 (AAC)