British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> London Borough of Redbridge v HO (SEN) (Special educational needs - special educational provision) [2020] UKUT 323 (AAC) (19 November 2020)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2020/323.html
Cite as: [2021] ELR 276, [2020] UKUT 323 (AAC)
[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
London Borough of Redbridge v H O (SEN) [2020] UKUT 323 (AAC) (19 November 2020)
This was a Local Authority appeal dealing with the level of specificity to be included in an Education Health and Care Plan. The provision in dispute was `[The pupil] requires extracurricular support for one hour a week at home from a trusted and familiar psychologist.' Following on from Judge West in Worcestershire CC v SE [2020] UKUT 217 AAC, I attempt to explain, having regard to previous case law, what `enough' detail entails in Education Health and Care Plans and when `enough is enough'.
A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2020] UKUT 323 (AAC)