SL v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (IS) and Carlisle City Council (HB) (Tribunal procedure and practice - set aside applications) [2017] UKUT 64 (AAC) (9 February 2017)
Adequacy of reasons in FTT’s decision refusing to set aside substantive decisions. Significance of rule 34(2) of Tribunal Rules (First-tier Tribunal) (SEC) Rules 2008 taken together with common law expectations: paragraphs 28 - 34; procedural error for rule 37 vs error of law or fact.
A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : 64.pdf