Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> LIVING TV (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2004] UKIntelP o16204 (4 June 2004)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2004/o16204.html
Cite as: [2004] UKIntelP o16204
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
LIVING TV (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2004] UKIntelP o16204 (4 June 2004)
For the whole decision click here: o16204
Trade mark decision
- BL Number
- O/162/04
- Decision date
- 4 June 2004
- Hearing officer
- Dr W J Trott
- Mark
- LIVING TV
- Classes
- 09, 16, 38, 41, 42
- Applicant
- Flextech Television Limited
- Opponent
- IPC Media Limited
- Opposition
- Request by applicant for a stay in proceedings to await outcome of revocation proceedings involving the opponent's mark LIVING.
Result
Request for a stay of proceedings - Request refused
Points Of Interest
- None.
Summary
Registration of the marks in suit were opposed by IPC in part on the basis of its ownership of the registered mark LIVING which is registered in Class 16 in respect of "printed periodical publications". On the day prior to the hearing of the opposition proceedings, the applicant filed an application for the revocation of IPC’s registration. At the hearing the applicant asked for a stay in the issue of the decision in the opposition proceedings until the outcome of the revocation proceedings was decided.
The Hearing Officer allowed the applicant a period of time to submit reasons for its request, which was opposed by IPC and this led to a further hearing to decide the matter.
The Hearing Officer considered the request for a stay in the opposition proceedings carefully but decided that a stay should not be granted. He noted that these parties have been in dispute for some time and that the applicant had had ample opportunity to launch revocation proceedings at a much earlier date, even before the date of the present opposition proceedings. They had not done so until the very last minute and additionally had given insufficient reason for the delay. Request refused.