British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >>
DEVICE ONLY (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2003] UKIntelP o22403 (11 August 2003)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2003/o22403.html
Cite as:
[2003] UKIntelP o22403
[
New search]
[
Printable PDF version]
[
Help]
DEVICE ONLY (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2003] UKIntelP o22403 (11 August 2003)
For the whole decision click here: o22403
Trade mark decision
- BL Number
- O/224/03
- Decision date
- 11 August 2003
- Hearing officer
- Mr C Bowen
- Mark
- DEVICE ONLY
- Applicant
- Decathlon
- Opponent
- Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG
- Opposition
- Interlocutory Hearing relating to the acceptance of evidence in reply
Result
Acceptance of evidence in reply: - Application refused.
Points Of Interest
-
The opponents confirmed that they did not wish the acceptance of the evidence to be considered under Rule 13(11) of the Trade Mark Rules 2000, which gives the Registrar a discretion to allow the filing of additional evidence if she thinks fit.
Summary
In the opposition proceedings the opponents say that the mark in suit is similar to a registered community mark in their ownership.
In their evidence in reply to the opponents evidence the applicants referred to a dispute involving the same parties in Denmark and filed a copy of a Danish decision which had been decided in their favour. In reply evidence the opponents included a copy of a Portuguese decision which had been decided in favour of the opponents. The applicants objected to the acceptance of this reply evidence as they said it was in fact, new evidence. Also in view of the dates of the decision it could have been filed by the opponents as part of their evidence in chief if they had wished to rely on it.