British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >>
JAVA EXPRESS (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2003] UKIntelP o18103 (26 June 2003)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2003/o18103.html
Cite as:
[2003] UKIntelP o18103
[
New search]
[
Printable PDF version]
[
Help]
JAVA EXPRESS (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2003] UKIntelP o18103 (26 June 2003)
For the whole decision click here: o18103
Trade mark decision
- BL Number
- O/181/03
- Decision date
- 26 June 2003
- Hearing officer
- Mr J MacGillivray
- Mark
- JAVA EXPRESS
- Classes
- 42
- Applicant
- Hyperama Plc
- Opponent
- Colin T. Loftus & Keith-Skinkis-Loftus t/a Java Bar Expresso
- Opposition
- Sections 5(2)(b) & 5(4)(a)
Result
Section 5(2)(b): - Opposition failed.
Section 5(4)(a): - Opposition failed.
Points Of Interest
-
1. See also under BL O/180/03 where the summary is more detailed.
-
2 The opponents appealed to the Appointed Person but had been declared bankrupt by the date of the Hearing. Hearing Officer’s decision upheld in Appointed Person’s decision dated 10 May 2004 (BL O/126/04).
Summary
This case was dealt with in a very similar way to that under BL O/180/03 where the applicant’s mark consisted of the words JAVE EXPRESS. In this case the applicant’s mark contains a device element, and again the Hearing Officer found under Section 5(2)(b) that it was not confusingly similar to the opponent’s JAVA BAR EXPRESSO and cocoa bean device mark or its JAVA and cocoa bean device mark. Opposition thus failed on this ground.
As the Hearing Officer considered that the opponent was in no better position under Section 5(4)(a) – Passing Off – as compared to Section 5(2)(b), he found that the opponent also failed on that ground.