British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >>
DRILLVAC (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2003] UKIntelP o07803 (10 March 2003)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2003/o07803.html
Cite as:
[2003] UKIntelP o07803,
[2003] UKIntelP o7803
[
New search]
[
Printable PDF version]
[
Help]
DRILLVAC (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2003] UKIntelP o07803 (10 March 2003)
For the whole decision click here: o07803
Trade mark decision
- BL Number
- O/078/03
- Decision date
- 10 March 2003
- Hearing officer
- Professor Ruth Annand
- Mark
- DRILLVAC
- Classes
- 07
- Applicant
- Owen Lewis Richardson
- Opponent
- Alouette Innovation Limited
- Opposition
- Appeal to the Appointed person in Opposition Proceedings
Result
Costs awarded in respect of the abandoned appeal.
Points Of Interest
-
1. Costs in proceedings before the Appointed Person.
-
2. 'Compensatory costs' ie damages, not a matter for the Appointed Person.
Summary
At first instance (see BL O/105/02) the Hearing Officer had found for the opponents under Section 5(4)(a). The applicant had first appealed that decision to the Appointed Person and then abandoned the appeal. The matter of costs was then considered by the Appointed person. She first stated that she had no jurisdiction to increase the award of costs made by the Hearing Officer. She did, however, have the power to make an award of costs to the opponents consequent upon the abandonment of the applicant’s appeal. The “compensatory costs” (in reality damages) claimed by the opponents, arising from disruption of their business activities however, would have to be pursued elsewhere. Having considered the costs incurred in the abandoned appeal, the Appointed Person awarded the opponents the sum of £400 (based on the Registrar’s scale of costs).