British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >>
DRILLVAC (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2002] UKIntelP o10502 (11 March 2002)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2002/o10502.html
Cite as:
[2002] UKIntelP o10502
[
New search]
[
Printable PDF version]
[
Help]
DRILLVAC (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2002] UKIntelP o10502 (11 March 2002)
For the whole decision click here: o10502
Trade mark decision
- BL Number
- O/105/02
- Decision date
- 11 March 2002
- Hearing officer
- Mr A James
- Mark
- DRILLVAC
- Classes
- 07
- Applicant
- Owen Lewis Richardson
- Opponent
- Alouette Innovation Limited
- Opposition
- Sections 3(6) & 5(4)(a)
Result
Section 3(6): - Opposition failed
Section 5(4)(a): - Opposition succeeded.
Points Of Interest
-
1. Volume of use required to establish claim of goodwill
Summary
The opponents claim to goodwill in the UK at the relevant date rested on a few sales, a mail shot to potential customers and, shortly before the relevant date, advertisements in trade magazines. The Hearing Officer concluded that these were sufficient to establish the claim of goodwill. The goods and marks being the same misrepresentation and damage could be safely inferred. The opposition under Section 5(4)(a) succeeded accordingly.
The Section 3(6) allegation was that the applicants had no bona fide intention to use the mark in the UK. The Hearing Officer saw that he was being asked to draw inferences and make assumptions about events which had taken place in Australia. This did not establish even a prima facie case, he decided