British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >>
ROYAL COUNTY OF BERKSHIRE POLO CLUB (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2002] UKIntelP o06802 (31 January 2002)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2002/o06802.html
Cite as:
[2002] UKIntelP o06802,
[2002] UKIntelP o6802
[
New search]
[
Printable PDF version]
[
Help]
ROYAL COUNTY OF BERKSHIRE POLO CLUB (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2002] UKIntelP o06802 (31 January 2002)
For the whole decision click here: o06802
Trade mark decision
- BL Number
- O/068/02
- Decision date
- 31 January 2002
- Hearing officer
- Mr David Kitchin QC
- Mark
- ROYAL COUNTY OF BERKSHIRE POLO CLUB
- Classes
- 33
- Applicants/Respondents
- Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Limited
- Opponents/Appellants
- Polo/Lauren Company LP
- Appeal to the Appointed Person against the decision of the Registrar’s Hearing Officer in Opposition proceedings (see SRIS O/317/01)
Result
Appeal dismissed
Points Of Interest
-
1. Adjectival use of a word is distinguishable from use of the same word as a noun and the resulting difference of perception may be sufficient to preclude a likelihood of confusion.
Summary
The Hearing Officer had found in favour of the opponents in respect of three out of the four marks in the series. The opponents appealed his decision in respect of the fourth mark. The opponents contended, inter alia, that the Hearing Officer had erred in placing too much reliance on the decision of the Appointed Person in a related, though different, case.
Mr Kitchin, however, noting the difficulty the Hearing Officer had had in deciding the matter, and confessing to the same difficulty himself, upheld the Hearing Officer’s decision. He, too, could not see how the average consumer could overlook the presence of the words ‘Royal County of Berkshire’ and ‘Club’ on the applicants’ mark. He considered that the word ‘POLO’ functioned as an adjective in the context of the mark. Appeal dismissed.