British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >>
TEAM (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2002] UKIntelP o05202 (4 February 2002)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2002/o05202.html
Cite as:
[2002] UKIntelP o05202,
[2002] UKIntelP o5202
[
New search]
[
Printable PDF version]
[
Help]
TEAM (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2002] UKIntelP o05202 (4 February 2002)
For the whole decision click here: o05202
Trade mark decision
- BL Number
- O/052/02
- Decision date
- 4 February 2002
- Hearing officer
- Mr Geoffrey Hobbs QC
- Mark
- TEAM
- Classes
- 30
- Registered Proprietor/Appellant
- Candy Team Süsswaren GmbH
- Applicants for Revocation/Respondents
- Mars UK Ltd
- Appeal from decision of the Registrar in respect of costs in revocation proceedings
Result
Appeal successful. - Award of costs increased.
Points Of Interest
-
1. Information filed, late, in response to a Rule 57 request should have been considered "in accordance with the logic of the decision requiring the information to be provided in the first place".
Summary
At first instance the Registrar’s Hearing Officer had declined to make an award of costs out with the published scale in favour of the registered proprietor, in respect of a withdrawn revocation action. (See SRIS O/097/01). The registered proprietor appealed to the Appointed Person. Reviewing the matter, the Appointed Person accepted that the original award of costs (£135) had been far too low in relation to the costs reasonably incurred by Candy, but even so, he felt the sum to be awarded should be compensatory, not punitive. He increased the award to £600 and he awarded a further £400 in respect of the appeal hearing.
The Appointed Person remarked that the Registrar’s response in ignoring information filed in response to a Rule 57 request because it arrived 50 minutes late was "disproportionate".