For the whole decision click here: o18701
Result
Section 3(1)(b) & (c): - Opposition not pursued. Section 3(6): - Opposition not pursued. Section 5(2)(b): - Opposition failed. Section 5(4)(a): - Opposition failed. Section 56: - Opposition not pursued. Section 3(6): - Opposition not pursued. Section 5(2)(b): - Opposition failed. Section 5(4)(a): - Opposition failed. Section 56: - Opposition not pursued.
Section 3(6): - Opposition not pursued.
Section 5(2)(b): - Opposition failed.
Section 5(4)(a): - Opposition failed.
Section 56: - Opposition not pursued.
Points Of Interest
Summary
Opposition based on opponent's registration of a TWIN CHEF device mark in Class 30. The opposition related to the same application under consideration in SRIS O/186/01, and the opponent relied on largely the same evidence and argument, but cited a different device mark. However, the Hearing Officer came to the same findings, dismissing opposition under Sections 5(2)(b) and 5(4)(a) for essentially the same reasons.