BAILII
British and Irish Legal Information Institute


Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information

[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> PZD (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o05400 (17 February 2000)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2000/o05400.html
Cite as: [2000] UKIntelP o05400, [2000] UKIntelP o5400

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

PZD (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o05400 (17 February 2000)

For the whole decision click here: o05400

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/054/00
Decision date
17 February 2000
Hearing officer
Mr A James
Mark
PZD
Classes
06, 07, 08, 09
Applicants
European Industrial Services Limited
Opponents
Black & Decker
Opposition
Sections 3(1)(a), 3(1)(b) & 3(1)(d)

Result

Section 3(1)(a) - Opposition failed.

Section 3(1)(b) - Opposition partially successful.

Section 3(1)(d) - Opposition failed.

Points Of Interest

  • 1. "The sign PZD has at least as much capricious alteration from the sign PZ as the word WELDMESH has from the generic words ‘welded mesh’."

Summary

The opposition was founded in the fact that the letters PZ were commonly used by manufacturers and merchants on screwdrivers and screwdriver bits to indicate that they were suitable for use in connection with a particular type of screw head: (POZIDRIVE). The Hearing Officer found that the mark PZD was not barred from registration by Sections 3(1)(a); it having sufficient ‘capricious variation’ from PZ. Neither was it barred by Section 3(1)(d), since the addition of the letter D resulted in a mark which did not consist exclusively of "signs or indications etc." Under Section 3(1)(b) however the Hearing Officer found that at the time of application the public would see PZD as merely a variant of PZ, when used on screwdrivers or screwdriver bits. For these goods, therefore, the mark was not distinctive. Application was permitted to proceed for a specification which excluded those items.


About BAILII - FAQ - Copyright Policy - Disclaimers - Privacy Policy amended on 25/11/2010