Page: 722↓
(Before
(Ante, Dec. 1, 1883, p. 164)
Subject_Bankruptcy — Sequestration — Contingent Belt.
Notour Bankruptcy — Debtors (Scotland) Act 1880 (43 and 44 Vict. c. 34).
In a petition for sequestration of the estates of a debtor who had become notour bankrupt, the petitioning creditor founded on a debt forming the balance of an account—current and vouched by a number of I O U's. It appeared from a letter of agreement by him which was produced, that he had agreed that until adjustment of the account between him and the debtor the I O U's should be retained as vouchers of the account-current, “upon which I cannot sue you or do diligence for them against you.” Held ( aff. judgment of First Division) that the debtor having become notour bankrupt, the creditor was not debarred by this agreement from applying for sequestration, founding on the I O U's as vouchers of the debt.
A charge was given on a decree obtained
Page: 723↓
in the Court of Session against a debtor. The debtor was insolvent and the charge was allowed to expire without payment, but after its expiry the debtor presented an appeal to the House of Lords which he had intimated while the charge was current. Held ( aff. judgment of First Division) that there was notour bankruptcy under the statute which could not be affected by the appeal.
This case is reported in the Court of Session, ante p. 164, December 1, 1883.
Fleming (suing in forma pauperis) appealed to the House of Lords and argued his case in person.
Connsel for the respondent were not called on.
The House affirmed the interlocutor of the First Division, and dismissed the appeal.
Solicitors: Agents for the Appellant— Simson, Wakeford, Goodhart, & Medcalf— William Officer, S.S.C.
Counsel for Respondent— Lord Adv. Balfour, Q.C.— Law. Agents— William Bell— D. S. & T. Littlejohn, Dundee.