British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
First-tier Tribunal (Tax)
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
First-tier Tribunal (Tax) >>
Tosum v Revenue & Customs [2012] UKFTT 22 (TC) (05 January 2012)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKFTT/TC/2012/TC01721.html
Cite as:
[2012] UKFTT 22 (TC)
[
New search]
[
Printable PDF version]
[
Help]
Mr O Tosum v Revenue & Customs [2012] UKFTT 22 (TC) (05 January 2012)
INCOME TAX/CORPORATION TAX
Penalty
[2012] UKFTT 22 (TC)
TC01721
Appeal number TC
2011/6583
INCOME TAX
– PENALTY FOR LATE FILING OF RETURN – Whether Appellant had reasonable
excuse for default – No – Appeal dismissed.
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
TAX
MR
O TOSUM Appellant
-
and -
THE
COMMISSIONERS FOR HER MAJESTY’S
REVENUE
AND CUSTOMS Respondents
TRIBUNAL:
MICHAEL TILDESLEY OBE
The Tribunal determined the
appeal on 12 December 2011 without a hearing under the provisions of Rule 26 of
the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal)(Tax Chamber) Rules 2009 (default
paper cases) having first read the Notice of Appeal dated 19 August 2011 and
HMRC’s Statement of Case submitted on 4 October 2011. The Appellant did not
provide a reply.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
2011
DECISION
1. The
Appellant appeals against the imposition of a fixed penalty in the sum of ₤100
for the late filing of his personal tax return for the year ending 5 April 2010.
2. On
6 April 2010 HMRC issued the Appellant with a notice to file his 2009/10 tax
return by 31 October 2010 for a paper return, and if online by 31 January 2011.
On 21 March 2011 the Appellant filed a paper return. The Appellant was,
therefore, liable to pay a fixed penalty of ₤100 for not filing the
return by 31 October 2010.
3. The
Appellant originally contended that he had filed his return by the due date and
was not liable to the fixed penalty. The Appellant, however, accepted that he
had provided an incomplete return which was sent back to him. The Appellant
supplied a completed return on 21 March 2011 which was late. The Appellant
stated that it was an oversight on his part and his accountant for submitting
an incomplete return. The Appellant had struggled from December 2010 because of
the downturn in the economy. A penalty of ₤100 created severe financial
pressures for him as he was on a tight budget.
4. The
Tribunal has limited jurisdiction in penalty Appeals which reflects the purpose
of the legislation of ensuring that tax payers file their returns on time. The
Tribunal has no power to mitigate the penalty. The Tribunal can either confirm
the penalty or quash it if satisfied that the Appellant has a reasonable excuse
for his failure. If there is a reasonable excuse it must exist throughout the
period of default. The Appellant has the obligation of satisfying the Tribunal
on a balance of probabilities that he has a reasonable excuse for not filing
the return on time.
5. Reasonable
excuse is not defined by statute. In considering a reasonable excuse the
Tribunal examines the actions of the Appellant from the perspective of a
prudent tax payer exercising reasonable foresight and due diligence and having
proper regard for his responsibilities under the Taxes Acts.
6. The
Appellant accepts that he sent an incomplete return which did not fulfil the
requirements of section 8 of the Taxes Management 1970. The Tribunal finds that
the return was filed on 21 March 2011 which was after the filing date for a
paper return, and, therefore, late.
7. The
question, therefore, is whether the Appellant had a reasonable excuse for the
late delivery of the return. The Appellant’s reasons of an oversight and
difficult financial circumstances do not constitute a reasonable excuse. A
prudent tax payer would have been aware of his responsibilities to provide a return
with the required information. The financial pressures of paying a penalty of a
₤100 would have been avoided if he had submitted a completed return on
time.
8. The
Tribunal dismisses the Appeal and confirms the fixed penalty of ₤100.
9. This
document contains full findings of fact and reasons for the decision. Any party
dissatisfied with this decision has a right to apply for permission to appeal
against it pursuant to Rule 39 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal)
(Tax Chamber) Rules 2009. The application must be received by this Tribunal
not later than 56 days after this decision is sent to that party. The parties
are referred to “Guidance to accompany a Decision from the First-tier Tribunal
(Tax Chamber)” which accompanies and forms part of this decision notice.
MICHAEL TILDESLEY OBE
TRIBUNAL JUDGE
RELEASE DATE: 5 January 2012