British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
First-tier Tribunal (Tax)
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
First-tier Tribunal (Tax) >>
The Company of the Plumed Horse Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2011] UKFTT 417 (TC) (24 June 2011)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKFTT/TC/2011/TC01270.html
Cite as:
[2011] UKFTT 417 (TC)
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
The Company of the Plumed Horse Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2011] UKFTT 417 (TC) (24 June 2011)
INCOME TAX/CORPORATION TAX
Penalty
[2011] UKFTT 417 (TC)
TC01270
Appeal number: TC/2011/01384
PENALTIES
– late filing of Company Tax Return – reasonable excuse – serious illness
within auditors’ office – appeal dismissed
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
TAX
THE
COMPANY OF THE PLUMED HORSE LTD Appellant
-
and -
THE
COMMISSIONERS FOR HER MAJESTY’S
REVENUE
AND CUSTOMS Respondents
TRIBUNAL:
LADY MITTING (TRIBUNAL JUDGE)
The Tribunal determined the
appeal on 20 May 2011 without a hearing under the provisions of Rule 26 of the
Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal)(Tax Chamber) Rules 2009 (default paper
cases) having first read the Notice of Appeal dated 15 February 2011, HMRC’s
Statement of Case submitted on 21 March 2011.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
2011
DECISION
1. The
Appellant appeals against flat rate penalties in the sum of £200 each imposed
in respect of accounting periods ending 31 October 2007 and 31 October 2008,
arising out of its failure to submit its Corporation Tax returns for the two
periods.
2. The
2007 return was due no later than 31 October 2008 and was lodged, showing a nil
Corporation Tax Liability, on 6 August 2010, a default period of 644 days.
3. The
2008 return was due no later then 31 October 2009 and was delivered on 6 August
2010, a default period of 279 days.
4. The
Appellant pleads a reasonable excuse for the failure to submit the returns
arising out of intense pressure within the offices of it s auditors. The
auditors were a two-partner practise, a Mr Malcom Uppard and Mr Ken Ashburner whose
wives handled the secretarial work. Within the three years 2007 to 2010, Mrs.
Ashburner died of cancer, Mrs Uppard was diagnosed with cancer and later died,
and Mr. Ashburner also died. Mr. Uppard was therefore left throughout this
period to manage the practise alone and to serve all the practise’s clients.
During the period Mr. Uppard sought assistance from other practises and has now
entered into an amalgamation. Throughout the period the practise struggled to
deal with its responsibilities and failed to submit the returns. The Appellant
pleads that it was not within it s capability to submit its own returns and it
was totally dependant upon the auditors to do so for it.
5. A
reasonable excuse is not defined by statute but it is expressly stated that the
taxpayer must act without unreasonable delay after the excuse has ceased. In
other words to succeed, the taxpayer must have had a reasonable excuse
throughout the period of default.
6. I
have every sympathy with Mr. Uppard. He was clearly under extraordinary personal
and professional pressure and the position in which he found himself was indeed
tragic. I accept that under certain circumstances illness within the offices
of a taxpayer’s representatives can constitute a reasonable excuse – especially
where the illness if sudden or indeed very serious. However, the tribunal is
looking not at Mr. Uppard’s position but that of the Appellant. It remains the
Appellant’s duty at all times to ensure that its returns are submitted in
time. Whilst initially the tragic circumstances surrounding Mr. Uppard might
well have constituted a reasonable excuse, that excuse cannot possibly have
lasted for the length of the default period. It was always open to the
Appellant to instruct new auitors to submit the returns, or estimated returns
to the best of its ability. Unfortunately the Appellant did none of these
things and did not in my view respond reasonably to the circumstances
7. I
therefore find that the Appellant did not have a reasonable excuse for the two
defaults and the appeal is dismissed.
8. This
document contains full findings of fact and reasons for the decision. Any party
dissatisfied with this decision has a right to apply for permission to appeal
against it pursuant to Rule 39 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal)
(Tax Chamber) Rules 2009. The application must be received by this Tribunal
not later than 56 days after this decision is sent to that party. The parties
are referred to “Guidance to accompany a Decision from the First-tier Tribunal
(Tax Chamber)” which accompanies and forms part of this decision notice.
JUDITH MITTING
TRIBUNAL JUDGE
RELEASE DATE: 24 JUNE 2011