First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)

(1) Dean Peter Amesbury (2) Rachel Louise Amesbury v (1) Gordon Murdoch (2) Sandra Murdoch (Practice and Procedure : Scope of jurisdiction) [2018] UKFTT 0577 (PC) (29 August 2018)

[2018] UKFTT 577 (PC). NOTES: The Tribunal's first instance decision in the previous case between the parties (case number REF/2012/0496) dated 20/08/2013 (Ms Sara Hargreaves) can be found as a separate entry on this website. The appeal judgment in the previous case can be found at http://taxandchancery_ut.decisions.tribunals.gov.uk/Documents/decisions/Murdoch-v-Amesbury.pdf. See also BEAN & SAXTON -V- KATZ & KATZ http://taxandchancery_ut.decisions.tribunals.gov.uk/Documents/decisions/Bean-Saxton-v-Katz-Katz-decision.pdf_ _ Following a previous appeal, a fresh application was made for a determined boundary, this time by Mr and Mrs Amesbury. Direction under section 110 Land Registration Act 2002 made; Tribunal proceedings and county court proceedings heard together under the pilot scheme, the judge sitting as both a county court judge and a tribunal judge. The Determined Boundary application in the tribunal failed, and a declaration of the position of the boundary was made by the county court.

A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2018] UKFTT 577 (PC)