BAILII
British and Irish Legal Information Institute


Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information

[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) >> Creams Peterborough Ltd v The Pensions Regulator [2025] UKFTT 583 (GRC) (29 May 2025)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKFTT/GRC/2025/583.html
Cite as: [2025] UKFTT 583 (GRC)

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

NCN: [2025] UKFTT 583 (GRC)

 Case Reference: FT.PEN.2024.0323

First-tier Tribunal

(General Regulatory Chamber)

PENSIONS

Decided without a hearing

Decision given on: 29 May 2025

Before

 

JUDGE HHJ David Dixon

 

Between

 

CREAMS PETERBOROUGH LIMITED

Appellant

and

 

THE PENSIONS REGULATOR

Respondent

Decision: The appeal is struck out.

 


 

REASONS

 

  1. On 11th September 2024 an "appeal" was received from the Appellant using form GRC1. It was unclear if the Appellant had a right of appeal, so the Tribunal required the Appellant to provide a "right to appeal" form. The Appellant has not complied with that direction. 
  2. As a result of the lack of detail, Case Management Directions, issued on 16th January 2025, followed indicating if a copy of the right to appeal form was not received by 30th January 2025 the case may be struck out.
  3. The Appellant has made no further contact with the Tribunal.
  4. By virtue of paragraph 8(3) of The Tribunal Procedure (First Tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009, the Tribunal make strike out a party's case, in whole or in part, where:
    1. the appellant has failed to comply with a direction which stated that failure by the appellant to comply with the direction could lead to the striking out of the proceedings or part of them;
    2. the appellant has failed to co-operate with the Tribunal to such an extent that the Tribunal cannot deal with the proceedings fairly and justly; or
    3. the Tribunal considers there is no reasonable prospect of the appellant's case, or part of it, succeeding.
  5. Here the Appellant has failed to provide the necessary documentation to confirm a right to Appeal, it has failed to co-operate with the proceedings and therefore it is difficult to see any reasonable prospect of the case succeeding.
  6. The Appeal is therefore struck out with immediate effect.

 

 

Signed: HH Judge David Dixon

Date: 28th May 2025

 

About BAILII - FAQ - Copyright Policy - Disclaimers - Privacy Policy amended on 25/11/2010