(General Regulatory Chamber)
Information Rights
B e f o r e :
____________________
AMEEL AMARNI R GRAY |
Applicant |
|
- and - |
||
THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER |
Respondent |
____________________
____________________
Crown Copyright ©
Decision made on the papers.
Decision: The Respondent's application to strike out the application of the Applicant is granted. The appeal is struck out under Rule 8(2)(a) as an application that cannot be made to this Tribunal and under Rule 8(3)(c) on the basis that there is no prospect of the application in being successful.
The legal framework and powers of the Tribunal
Analysis and conclusions
Sometimes, you may disagree with information written in your record, but the information could still be factually correct. For example, you may disagree with a diagnosis you were given in the past. Whilst you can still ask the organisation to amend the entry that you feel is inaccurate, an organisation should not change it if the health and care professional believes it is factually correct.
District Judge Moan sitting as a First Tier Tribunal Judge
18th December 2024