British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >>
UI2022006675 [2024] UKAITUR UI2022006675 (7 May 2024)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2024/UI2022006675.html
Cite as:
[2024] UKAITUR UI2022006675
[
New search]
[
Printable PDF version]
[
Help]
IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL
IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBER |
Case No: UI-
2022-006675 |
|
First-tier Tribunal No: HU/55990/2021 |
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Decision & Reasons Issued:
On 7
th of May 2024
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE RINTOUL
Between
AMIRA DHAES
(NO ANONYMITY ORDER MADE)
Appellant
and
THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent
Representation
:
For the Appellant: Mr E McKay, solicitor
For the Respondent: Mr A Mullen, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer
Heard at 52 Melville Street Edinburgh on 30 April 2024
DECISION MADE PURSUANT TO RULES 34, 39 & 40 (3) OF THE
TRIBUNAL PROCEDURE (UPPER TRIBUNAL) RULES 2008
-
The appellant appeals with permission against the decision of First-tier Tribunal D H Clapham promulgated on 11 June 2022 dismissing her appeal against a decision of the Secretary of State made on 17 September 2021 to refuse her entry clearance to the United Kingdom.
-
Both parties agreed that the decision of the First-tier Tribunal involved the making of an error of law. That is because the judge failed properly to address the evidence going relevant to the issue of proportionality; and, failed to identify whether there was a family life for the purposes of article 8.
-
In the circumstances, the appeal will in effect have to be heard again and thus I am satisfied that it is in the interests of justice to remit it to the First-tier Tribunal for it to make a fresh decision. The finding that the appellant and sponsor as claimed is preserved.
-
Rule 40 (1) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 provided that the Upper Tribunal may give a decision orally at a hearing which I did. Rule 40 (3) provides that the Upper Tribunal must provide written reasons for its decision with a decision notice unless the parties have consented to the Upper Tribunal not giving written reasons. I am satisfied that the parties have given such consent at the hearing.
Notice of Decision
1.
The decision of the First-tier Tribunal involved the making of an error of law and is set aside.
2.
The appeal is remitted to the First-tier Tribunal. The finding that the appellant and sponsor and mother and son is preserved.
Signed Date: 30 April 2024
Jeremy K H Rintoul
Judge of the Upper Tribunal