IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBER |
Case No: UI-2023-002420 UI-2023-002421 First Tier No: EA/51793/2022 EA/51794/2022 |
|
|
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Decision & Reasons Issued:
On the 10 October 2023
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE LANE
Between
Dennis Sackey and Ms. Zenobia Ekua Fio Sackey
(NO ANONYMITY ORDER MADE)
Appellant
and
Secretary of State for the Home Department Respondent
Representation :
For the Appellant: Mr Karim
For the Respondent: Mr Diwnycz, Senior Presenting Officer
Heard at Phoenix House (Bradford) on 9 October 2023
DECISION AND REASONS
1. The Appellants appeal against a determination of First-tier Tribunal Judge Hillis promulgated on 14th June 2023.
2. At the initial hearing at Bradford on 9 October 2023, Mr Karim, who appeared for the appellants, submitted that the judge had been required only to determine the validity of the marriage of the appellants and not whether their relationship was subsisting. Validity had been the sole reason for refusal and, having found at [12] that the marriage certificate was a genuine document and that its contents should be relied upon, the First-tier Tribunal should have allowed the appeal. Mr Diwnycz, who appeared for the Secretary of State, told me that he agreed with Mr Karim and the appeal was not opposed. Accordingly, he made no submissions.
3. In the circumstances, I set aside the decision of the First-tier Tribunal and remake the decision allowing the appeal against the decision of the Secretary of State dated 24 November 2022.
Notice of Decision
I allow the appeal and remake the decision allowing the appeal against the decision of the Secretary of State dated 24 November 2022
C. N. Lane
Judge of the Upper Tribunal
Immigration and Asylum Chamber
Dated: 9 October 2023