British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >>
UI2022006226 & Ors [2023] UKAITUR UI2022006226 (8 June 2023)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2023/UI2022006226.html
Cite as:
[2023] UKAITUR UI2022006226
[
New search]
[
Printable PDF version]
[
Help]
IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL
IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBER |
Case No: UI-
2022-006226
UI-2022-006227
UI-2022-006228
UI-2022-006229 |
|
First-tier Tribunal Nos:
HU/57159/2021-
LH/00389/2022
HU/57165/2021-
LH/00393/2022
HU/57161/2021-
LH/00392/2022
HU/57163/ 2021-
LH/00390/2022 |
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Decision & Reasons Issued:
On the 08 June 2023
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE RINTOUL
Between
RANGINA QADRI
NAZOO QADRI
MURTAZA QADRI
ZOHIBULLAH QADRI
(NO ANONYMITY ORDER MADE)
Appellant
and
THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent
Representation
:
For the Appellant: Mr Ellis Wilford, instructed by Lawrence & Co Solicitors
For the Respondent: Mr D Clarke, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer
Heard at Field House on 7 June 2023
DECISION MADE PURSUANT TO RULES 34, 39 & 40 (3) OF THE
TRIBUNAL PROCEDURE (UPPER TRIBUNAL) RULES 2008
- The appellants appeal with permission against the decision of the First-tier Tribunal promulgated on 11 October 2022.
- In the light of the submissions by both parties, and the effective agreement by the respondent that the judge erred in failing properly to apply the test of fairness to the application to adjourn, the decision of the First-tier Tribunal involved the making of an error of law for the reasons set out in grounds 1 and 2.
- As the hearing was unfair, it follows that none of the findings of fact can be preserved, the appeal will have to be heard again and accordingly it is appropriate to remit it to the First-tier Tribunal.
- Rule 40 (1) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 provided that the Upper Tribunal may give a decision orally at a hearing which I did. Rule 40 (3) provides that the Upper Tribunal must provide written reasons for its decision with a decision notice unless the parties have consented to the Upper Tribunal not giving written reasons. I am satisfied that the parties have given such consent at the hearing.
Notice of Decision
1.
The decision of the First-tier Tribunal involved the making of an error of law and is set aside.
2.
I remit the appeal to the First-tier Tribunal for a fresh hearing on all issues.
Signed Date: 7 June 2023
Jeremy K H Rintoul
Judge of the Upper Tribunal
Immigration and Asylum Chamber