Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> EA010492015 & EA010522015 [2018] UKAITUR EA010492015 (14 February 2018)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2018/EA010492015.html
Cite as: [2018] UKAITUR EA010492015, [2018] UKAITUR EA10492015
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Numbers: EA/01049/2015
ea/01052/2015
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
|
Heard at Field House |
Decision & Reasons Promulgated |
|
On 23 January 2018 |
On 14 February 2018 |
|
|
|
Before
DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MCGEACHY
Between
miss Hina Altaf Bajwa (first appellant)
mr Huma Altaf Bajwa (second appellant)
(ANONYMITY DIRECTION NOT MADE)
Appellants
and
THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent
Representation :
For the Appellants: Mr R Sharma, of Counsel instructed by Messrs Stella Maris Solicitors LLP
For the Respondent: Mr E Tufan, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer
DECISION AND REASONS
1. The appellants appeal against a determination of Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Mitchell who in a determination promulgated on 12 May 2017 dismissed their appeals for lack of jurisdiction.
2. The appellants had applied against a decision of the Entry Clearance Officer, Islamabad to refuse them EEA family permits to enable them to join an uncle in Britain as other family members under the provisions of Regulation 8 of the Immigration (EEA) Regulations 2006.
3. Judge Mitchell dismissed their claims appling the terms of the determination of the Tribunal in Sala (EFMs: Right of Appeal) [2016] UKUT 411/IAC. He did not consider the merits of the claims.
4. The decision in Sala has been overturned by the Court of Appeal in their judgment in Khan v SSHD [2017] EWCA Civ 1744. In that judgment the Court of Appeal ruled that those who applied for leave to remain or enter under Regulation 8 of the Immigration (EEA) Regulations 2006 were entitled to a full right of appeal.
5. Mr Tufan conceded that therefore the decision of the judge in the First-tier was made in error and that therefore the appeal should be remitted to the First-tier for a hearing afresh on all issues.
6. It is appropriate therefore that I set aside the decision of the judge in the First-tier and direct that the appeal be remitted to the First-tier for a further decision.
Notice of Decision
The appeal is allowed to the extent that it is remitted for a hearing afresh and the First-tier Tribunal on all issues.
No anonymity direction is made.
Signed Date: 9 February 2018
Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge McGeachy