|
||
|
||
Scottish
Law Commission
promoting law
reform |
||
|
||
|
||||||
|
||||||
Scottish
Law Commission
promoting law
reform |
||||||
|
||||||
|
Established under the Law Commissions
Act 1965 |
|
||||
|
||||||
|
Our function
To recommend reforms to improve, simplify and update the
law of Scotland
Our role
To play a leading role in
developing the law for the people of Scotland so that it is just, principled, responsive and easy to understand |
|
||||
|
||||||
annual report I
2007 |
||||||
|
||||||
|
||
|
||
Professor George Gretton,
Professor Gerry Maher, Colin Tyre (seated), Michael Lugton, Lord Drummond
Young and Professor Joe Thomson |
||
|
||
978 0 10888 217 3 |
||
|
||
|
||||
SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT
2007 |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Scottish
Law Commission
promoting law
reform |
||||
|
||||
Annual
Report 2007 |
||||
|
||||
To: Mr Kenny MacAskill MSP, Cabinet Secretary for
Justice
We are pleased to submit to the
Scottish Ministers our Annual Report for the year to 31 December 2007. |
||||
|
||||
&v^ JAMES DRUMMOND YOUNG,
Chairman |
||||
|
||||
GEORGE
GRETTON |
||||
|
||||
GERARD
MAHER |
||||
JOSEPH M
THOMSON |
||||
COLIN
TYRE |
||||
|
||||
Michael Lugton, Chief
Executive
6 February 2008 Laid before the Scottish
Parliament by the Scottish Ministers under section 3(3) of the
Law Commissions Act 1965 |
||||
|
||||
February 2008 |
||||
|
||||
SG/2008/16
EDINBURGH:
The Stationery Office
£13.90 |
||||
|
||||
|
||
|
||
|
|||
SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT
2007 |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
In
November we received a new reference from the
Scottish Government on a range of aspects of criminal law and procedure; initially we are considering possible Crown rights of appeal against judicial rulings that can end a solemn case without a jury verdict and certain aspects of the rule against double jeopardy. References from Government form an important aspect of our work, and we are always anxious to deal with them expeditiously. During
2008 we will continue to make progress with
our existing projects. We envisage publication of reports on our projects on Crown appeals and damages for wrongful death. We will also start to develop proposals for our Eighth Programme, which will operate from 2010 onwards. We are
pleased that the Scottish Government has
stated that it will implement our Report (published in 2006) on Interest on Debt and Damages. It is nevertheless a matter of some concern that a significant number of our other reports since devolution remain to be implemented. During the year we have had useful discussions with the Cabinet Secretary for Justice, and we very much hope that these will lead to the further implementation of our reports. Finally,
our success during the year is due to the dedication, ability and hard work of all of the staff of the Commission and my fellow Commissioners, and I would like to pay tribute to them. |
|||
It gives
me much pleasure to present the
Commission's Annual Report for the year 2007. Four
reports were published during the year, dealing
with the variation and termination of trusts, limitation and prescribed claims, the implications of the case of Sharp v Thomson, and rape and other sexual offences. The Scottish Government has indicated that during 2008 it will introduce a Bill to implement the Report on Rape and Other Sexual Offences, and we very much welcome the prompt implementation of our reports in this way. During
2007 we also published discussion papers dealing with succession and damages for wrongful death and, jointly with the English Commission, a consultation paper concerning aspects of insurance contract law. We have also begun work on two new projects, on unincorporated associations and consumer remedies, the latter being a joint project with the English Commission. Work has also continued on the very major project dealing with land registration. |
|||
THE HON LORD DRUMMOND
YOUNG
Chairman |
|||
|
|||
5 |
|||
|
|||
|
||
6 |
||
|
||
|
|||
SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT
2007 |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
Annual Report
2006
Scot Law Com No
205
Report
on Variation and Termination of Trusts
Scot Law Com No
206
Insurance
Contract Law: Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and
Breach of Warranty by the Insured – A Joint Consultation Paper DP No
134
Discussion Paper
on Damages for Wrongful Death
DP No 135
Discussion Paper on
Succession
DP No 136
Report
on Personal Injury Actions: Limitation and Prescribed
Claims
Scot Law Com No
207
Report on
Sharp v Thomson
Scot Law Com No
208
Report
on Rape and Other Sexual Offences
Scot Law Com No
209 |
20
March 2007
30 March 2007 17 July 2007 1
August 2007 16 August 2007 5 December 2007 12 December 2007 19 December 2007 |
||
|
|||
In
addition two papers on insurance law, which are not included in our
numbered series, were published jointly with the Law Commission: Issues Paper 3: Intermediaries and Pre-Contract Information, published in March 2007 and Issues Paper 4: Insurable Interest, published in January 2008. |
|||
|
|||
Copies of all these
publications are available on our website www.scotlawcom.gov.uk |
|||
|
|||
7 |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
Seventh Programme
of Law Reform
Our Seventh Programme of Law
Reform, published
in February 2005, outlines the main projects on which we will be working up to the end of 2009. It incorporates ongoing work from our last programme of law reform and outlines projects on which we are currently working including those on property law, succession, trusts, unincorporated associations, and assignation of, and security over, incorporeal moveable property. The programme also includes a criminal law project on the law on provocation, self- defence, coercion, and necessity. The programme was prepared after
extensive
consultation with the legal profession, a wide range of other interested bodies and with the public into areas of law they thought were in need of reform. The consultation process was extremely helpful and indeed two projects on which we are working – the law of succession and on unincorporated associations - were included in the programme as a result of suggestions made to us. During 2008 we will start
preparations for our Eighth Programme which will set out our programme of work from 2010 to 2014. We expect to start the consultation process on a draft programme towards the end of 2008, with a general public consultation in the first half of 2009. |
References from
Ministers
While projects under our Seventh
Programme form
the core of our law reform work, we also undertake work in response to references from Ministers. These projects are an important part of our work and are usually prompted by concern about specific areas of law which may need reform. Topics referred to us are usually on legal issues which need fairly urgent review. For that reason, we generally aim to complete work on references within a shorter timescale than our programme work. New projects
In November 2007 we received a
new reference on
criminal law from the Scottish Ministers inviting us to consider the law relating to - •
judicial rulings that can bring
a solemn case to
an end without the verdict of a jury and rights of appeal against such; •
the principle of double
jeopardy and whether
there should be exceptions to it; •
admissibility of evidence of
bad character or of
previous convictions, and of similar fact evidence; and . the Moorov doctrine.
This is a substantial reference.
For that reason we have decided that work should be divided into separate projects. We have started work on the first two parts of the reference and will turn to the remaining parts of the reference once those projects have been completed. |
||
|
|||
|
||
SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT
2007 |
||
|
||
Recently we received a reference
to undertake a
joint project with the Law Commission in London, on consumer remedies. The project will be looking at ways of simplifying the remedies available to consumers, for example when they purchase faulty goods. Implementation of our
reports
In recent years we have been
pleased to assist the
Scottish Government in connection with the passage of several Bills in the Scottish Parliament which implemented our recommendations for reform on a number of topics, particularly property law. We regard this work as an important part of our role and one which we hope to continue in the future. We hope to assist the Scottish
Government during 2008 with implementation of recommendations in our Report on Rape and Other Sexual Offences, once the public consultation exercise has been completed. |
||
|
||
Further
information about implementation of
our
reports can be found on the Publications
page of
our website
|
||
|
||
9 |
||
|
||
|
|||||
Projects
under our Seventh
Programme Land
registration |
Work is
progressing on our report and draft Bill,
both of which are likely to be lengthy. The project is a medium-term one under our Seventh Programme and as such is due for completion by the end of 2009 at latest. We hope to complete this project by the end of 2008 or in the first half of 2009. Trusts |
||||
|
Project Team |
|
|||
Professor
George Gretton, Commissioner John Dods, Project Manager Ross Sanderson, Legal Assistant John Glover, Registers of Scotland |
|||||
Project
Team |
|||||
Professor
Joe Thomson, Commissioner Colin Tyre QC, Commissioner David Nichols, Project Manager Lyndsey Foggarty, Legal Assistant |
|||||
The
modern system of land registration was
introduced by the Land Registration (Scotland) Act 1979. The new system has brought with it many benefits. But experience has disclosed certain shortcomings in the legislation, and it became apparent some years ago that a review would be desirable. The project is aimed at enhancing the technical functionality of the system, improving the fit between registration law and general property law, removing certain practical difficulties arising from the current legislation, bringing clarity to matters that are obscure under that legislation, and overhauling existing property statutes to make them e-compatible. Registers of Scotland have provided, and are continuing to provide, extensive support for the project and we are most grateful to them for that support. The
issues involved are complex and for that reason we published three separate discussion papers on different aspects of reform. The first discussion paper - on Void and Voidable Titles - examined the legal policy issues underlying land registration, while the Discussion Paper on Registration, Rectification and Indemnity considered the provisions of the 1979 Act. The third discussion paper - on Miscellaneous Issues - dealt with topics such as descriptions and boundaries, servitudes, overriding interests, and decision-making by the Keeper of the Registers of Scotland. |
|||||
Trust law
is a long-term project which is likely to be
carried forward into our next programme of law reform. It is a substantial project and for that reason we are working on it in two main stages, dealing with trusts and trustees. We have
published five discussion papers so far,
covering a range of topics: • Breach of Trust
• Apportionment of Trust Receipts and Outgoings
• Trustees and Trust Administration
• Variation and Termination of Trusts
• The Nature and Constitution of Trusts
The
first of our Reports – on Variation and Termination of Trusts – was published in March 2007. Our recommendations address some of the difficulties that arise when private trusts are varied or terminated and seek to simplify the reorganisation of charities, public trusts and endowments. |
|||||
|
|||||
10 |
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT
2007 |
|||||
|
|||||
As regards private trusts, at
present the beneficiaries if
all of full age and capacity may agree to vary the trust, terminate it or resettle the trust property in another trust. As there was no support from consultees for change, the Report recommends that the present position be given statutory authority and the draft Bill annexed to the Report sets out new statutory provisions. We also recommend that parents or guardians should continue not to be permitted to agree to a variation or termination on behalf of a child who is a beneficiary under a trust, because of the likelihood of there being a conflict of interest. Section 1 of the Trusts
(Scotland) Act 1961 allows
the court to approve on behalf of underage, unborn or incapable beneficiaries a variation or termination of a private trust. The Report recommends a number of changes to improve the way this section works in practice by giving the court the following additional powers: •
power to exonerate trustees
from liability where
an interest of negligible value which has been cut out by the variation unexpectedly emerges; •
power to approve a variation
which would
prejudice an unborn beneficiary if there is no reasonable likelihood of such a beneficiary being born; •
power to approve a variation on
behalf of an
untraceable beneficiary; •
power to take non-economic
considerations into
account in assessing whether there is prejudice to an underage, incapable or unborn beneficiary. In the public trust field there
are different regimes for reorganising endowments, charities and non- charity public trusts. We recommend that the criteria for reorganisation should be simplified, should be the same for all, and that the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator (which approves reorganisations of charities) should also deal with reorganisations of public trusts and endowments. |
We are now considering liability
of trustees to third
parties with a view to publishing a discussion paper on this topic early in 2008. Succession |
||||
|
Project Team |
|
|||
Professor Joe
Thomson, Commissioner David Nichols, Project Manager Maria Theodossiou, Legal Assistant |
|||||
We decided to undertake a further
review of the law
of succession following suggestions made to us during consultation on a draft of our Seventh Programme. Our earlier Report on Succession, published in 1990, dealt with a wide range of issues but has not been implemented. The current project is
re-examining succession law
to ensure that it reflects current social attitudes and deals with the types of relationship which have become fairly common in Scotland in recent years. We published a Discussion Paper
in August 2007.
The two main parts of the Discussion Paper consider the rights of surviving spouses, civil partners, cohabitants, children and stepchildren on intestacy; and whether these relatives should be protected against disinheritance and how such protection is best achieved. In relation to the law of
intestacy, we propose that
where there are no surviving issue, the surviving spouse or civil partner should be entitled to the whole estate. Where there are also surviving issue, we propose that the surviving spouse or civil partner should continue to have a measure of priority as at present and should be entitled to the deceased's whole estate up to £300,000 with half of any excess being shared equally with the issue. Following concerns expressed by
members of our advisory group, the Discussion Paper also considers |
|||||
|
|||||
11 |
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||
whether
executors-dative appointed by the court in
intestate estates should continue to be required to find caution. In cases
of testate succession we propose a rule- based scheme of protection for surviving spouses or civil partners whereby the survivor would be entitled to 25% of what he or she would have received had the deceased died intestate under our new intestacy proposals. We propose extending to testate estates the recently enacted court-based protection scheme in section 29 of the Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 for people whose cohabitating partners died intestate. We also favour a court-based scheme for dependent children to whom the deceased owed an obligation of aliment. We tend to think that there should be no protection for adult children, but if they are to be protected then we put forward a rule- based scheme with the entitlement being 25% of what the child would have received on intestacy. |
The
Discussion Paper also considers whether
provisions should be introduced in order to prevent a person evading before death the proposed protections against disinheritance by way of lifetime gifts, the prescription of disinheritance claims, and private international law matters. The
consultation period ended in December. We are now considering the responses with a view to completing our report around the end of 2008. |
||
|
|||
|
|||
David Nichols, Maria
Theodossiou and Professor Joe Thomson |
|||
|
|||
12 |
|||
|
|||
|
||||
SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT
2007 |
||||
|
||||
Assignation
of and security over incorporeal moveable property |
||||
|
||||
|
Project Team |
|
||
|
||||
Professor
George Gretton, Commissioner John Dods, Project Manager Ross Sanderson, Legal Assistant |
||||
|
||||
This
project was suggested to us by the Law Society
of Scotland and a number of other consultees during consultation on items for inclusion in our current programme of law reform. It is a substantial long- term project which we intend to carry forward into our next programme of law reform, starting in 2010. The resources available to the project will continue to be limited until the land registration project has been completed. During
the year we studied developments in this area in a number of European countries. We also embarked on a series of pre-consultation meetings. Those we met included representatives of the Insolvency Practitioners Association, HM Revenue & Customs, the Royal Bank of Scotland, CBI Scotland, and solicitors' firms with clients who are involved in such transactions. During 2008 we intend to hold further pre-consultation meetings. |
||||
|
||||
13 |
||||
|
||||
|
|||||
Unincorporated
associations |
Judicial
factors
Our
Seventh Programme includes a project to
review the law relating to judicial factors. The legislation on this topic has been in existence for over a hundred years and requires to be updated to suit modern needs. We have
completed our research for a discussion
paper, which we had hoped to publish during 2007. However, we have not been able to complete the discussion paper as we have had to give priority to completing our project on rape and other sexual offences. Furthermore, as we now need to devote resources to the new reference on criminal law, we have decided to suspend work on this project meantime. Provocation,
self-defence, coercion,
and necessity We
included in our current programme a project to
review the defences of provocation, self-defence, coercion and necessity, as a follow-up to our earlier Report on Insanity and Diminished Responsibility, published in 2004. The decision to undertake the project arose in part from the case of Drury v HM Advocate 2001 SCCR 583, in which the court commented that the law of provocation should be reformed and restated in statutory form. We decided to extend the scope of the project to include self-defence, coercion and necessity as those topics are also in need of review. We had
planned to start work on this project once we had completed our review of the law of rape and other sexual offences. As we have been asked by Scottish Ministers to give priority to the new criminal law reference, which we received in November 2007, we have deferred work on this project for the time being, although we intend to consult on whether the project should be carried forward into our next programme of law reform, due to start in 2010. |
||||
|
Project Team |
|
|||
Colin
Tyre QC, Commissioner Gillian Swanson, Project Manager Lyndsey Foggarty, Legal Assistant |
|||||
Unincorporated
associations exist for a wide variety
of purposes and in a wide range of sizes and structures. At one end of the scale they may be substantial organisations with property, employees and contractual commitments. At the other end, they may be informal groupings of individuals joining together for temporary and specific purposes. In Scots
law, such associations are not recognised as
having a separate legal personality. It is this absence of personality which can create difficulties especially in connection with entering into contracts, owning property and dealing with claims by or against the association and its members. The project will look at ways of removing the current difficulties, possibly by giving some form of legal status to unincorporated associations. The
subject matter of this project is reserved under
the Scotland Act 1998 and any recommendations which we may make will fall to be implemented by the United Kingdom Parliament. For that reason we intend to keep in close touch with the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform as regards progress with our work. We have
completed our initial research and have recently discussed a short preliminary paper with several interested parties. We aim to publish a discussion paper in the second half of 2008. |
|||||
|
|||||
14 |
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||
SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT
2007 |
|||
|
|||
References
from Scottish
Ministers Rape
and other sexual offences |
We
recommend that the crime of rape should
continue to be tried only in the High Court and that there should be a maximum sentence of life imprisonment for rape, sexual assault and certain acts of sexual coercion. For the
first time in Scots law, the meaning of
consent, which lies at the heart of the new offences, is to be made clear. It is defined as 'free agreement' and we set out a list of situations in which there is no consent, such as when a person is incapable through intoxication, or is threatened with violence, or is deceived about the purpose of the sexual activity. One of
the main aims of our recommendations is to
ensure that there is no distinction between male and female victims or between male and female perpetrators. Many of the current offences are framed in a way which does not respect this principle. As part of this aim we recommend the repeal of offences based on sexual orientation as we see no general justification for consenting conduct being criminal. Another
principle which we have sought to promote
is that of sexual autonomy. This means that non- consenting sexual conduct should be criminal, as it represents an invasion of the victim's sexual autonomy, while consenting sexual conduct should not be criminal unless there are powerful reasons for creating an offence. A further
principle which we have adopted in the Report – the 'protective principle' – is that some people should be protected from all sexual activity, such as young children, while more limited protection should cover those who may be able to consent to sexual activity but who should be protected in view of their relative immaturity or vulnerability. |
||
Project
Team
Professor
Gerry Maher QC, Commissioner Charles Garland, Project Manager Cara Jardine, Legal Assistant |
|||
We
completed work on this project in December
when our wide ranging Report on Rape and Other Sexual Offences was published. The Report marks an important stage in the first ever systematic review of Scots law on sexual offences. We were
asked by Scottish Ministers to review this
area of law following two widely-reported High Court cases in 2004 and concern among professionals involved in this area of law as well as the general public that the law was unclear. The
Report recommends an extension to the definition of rape aimed at protecting both male and female victims. It also recommends the creation of the new offence of sexual assault which would cover sexual touching or other forms of sexual contact without the victim's consent. In addition sexual coercion would be made a crime. This means that it would be an offence to make a person watch or participate in a sexual activity without the person's consent. It would also cover the sending of sexual e-mails and other communications without the recipient's consent, if the sender acts out of sexual gratification or an intention to humiliate or distress the recipient. |
|||
|
|||
15 |
|||
|
|||
|
|||||
In our
Discussion Paper, published in January 2006,
we sought views on whether the existing rules of corroboration should be relaxed or removed in respect of sexual offences. The vast majority of consultees were opposed to removing corroboration in cases involving sexual offences. In view of this response we have concluded that if the rules on corroboration need to be reviewed they should be considered as part of a general review of corroboration as it applies throughout the criminal law. For that reason the Report makes no recommendations as regards corroboration in relation to sexual offences. On publication of the Report the
Scottish
Government announced a public consultation on our recommendations with a view to introducing a Bill in the Scottish Parliament in 2008. Crown
appeals |
At
present there are two types of ruling which
directly lead to an acquittal - a ruling on a submission of no case to answer under the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 - and a ruling following what is called a "common law submission" which follows the conclusion of evidence. A judge may also make rulings on other matters such as the admissibility of essential pieces of evidence which, while not formally amounting to an acquittal, undermine the prosecution case to the extent that an acquittal becomes inevitable. Although
the issues involved in the project arose in
some recent criminal decisions, the project will consider the issues in the broad context of the criminal law generally. We
started initial research for the project towards
the end of 2007. We also established a small group comprising members of the Judiciary to assist us and had our first meeting with them in December. We aim
to consult on our proposals in the spring with a view to reporting with recommendations for reform in the summer of 2008. |
||||
|
Project Team |
|
|||
The
Hon Lord Drummond Young, Commissioner Alastair Smith, Project Manager Cara Jardine, Legal Assistant |
|||||
|
|||||
This
topic is the first part of the new reference on
criminal law, received from Scottish Ministers in November. This
part of the reference relates to judicial rulings that can bring a case under solemn criminal procedure to an end without the merits of the case being considered by a jury, and Crown rights of appeal against such rulings. |
|||||
|
|||||
16 |
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||||
SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT
2007 |
|||||||
|
|||||||
Double
jeopardy |
Personal
injury actions: limitation and prescribed claims |
||||||
|
|||||||
|
Project Team |
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Professor
Gerry Maher QC, Commissioner Alastair Smith, Project Manager Nicola McGowan, Legal Assistant |
|
Project Team |
|
||||
The
Hon Lord Drummond Young, Commissioner Susan Sutherland, Project Manager Maria Theodossiou, Legal Assistant |
|||||||
|
|||||||
This
topic forms the second part of the recent
reference from Scottish Ministers on criminal justice topics. In
general terms the principle of double jeopardy is
that a person may not be tried more than once for the same offence. Similar reviews have been undertaken in other jurisdictions which we will be examining as part of our work. The project will examine the
operation of the
principle of double jeopardy in existing Scots law. We will also review the rationales underlying the principle of double jeopardy and consider whether grounds may exist for making any exceptions to it. We have
started initial research and a study of comparative law with a view to preparing a discussion paper. |
This
project was completed in December with the
publication of our Report on Personal Injury Actions: Limitation and Prescribed Claims. The
Report is in response to two references by the
Scottish Ministers in September 2004 and August 2005. The first reference related to the provisions of the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973 which set out the rules of limitation in personal injury actions. The second reference, which concerned prescribed claims, arose from concerns by survivors of alleged institutional child abuse that they could not bring claims for damages because their right of action had been extinguished as a result of the law of prescription. As
regards the limitation rules, the Report
recommends a five-year limitation period for personal injury actions in place of the current three- year limit. The longer period is aimed at assisting claimants and their advisers, particularly in cases involving claims for occupational diseases, where gathering evidence to bring a claim for damages can be very time consuming and difficult. The Report recommends changes to the statutory knowledge test so that it focuses on the key question of the seriousness of the pursuer's injuries. In connection with the judicial
discretion to allow time-barred actions to proceed where the court thinks it is appropriate, we recommend the introduction of a statutory list of factors which the court may take into account when exercising its discretion. |
||||||
|
|||||||
17 |
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||
As
regards the second reference, while we have
sympathy with alleged victims of institutional child abuse and others whose claims have been extinguished by prescription we recommend that such claims should not be revived, for a number of reasons which we outline in the Report. The
Report includes a draft Bill which if
implemented would give effect to our recommendations for amendments to the 1973 Act. Sharp
v Thomson |
•
to ensure that floating charges cannot
attach to
the property without the attachment having been publicly registered - the "no attachment without registration" principle. The Report also recommends the
abolition of an
antiquated rule which allows the liquidator of an insolvent corporate seller to out-manoeuvre a buyer by means of an immediate "completion of title". Two proposals in our earlier
Discussion Paper are not
included in the recommendations. One of the proposals related to the doctrine of the "purchaser's beneficial interest", but following the House of Lords decision in Burnett's Trustee v Grainger 2004 SC (HL) 19, there is no longer any need for legislation on that issue. The other proposal has already
been implemented in section 17 of the Bankruptcy and Diligence etc. (Scotland) Act 2007, which enhances a buyer's protection against the insolvency of an individual non-corporate seller. |
||||
|
Project Team |
|
|||
Professor
George Gretton, Commissioner John Dods, Project Manager Ross Sanderson, Legal Assistant |
|||||
We completed work on this project
in December
with the publication of our Report, which makes recommendations to Scottish Ministers arising out of the case of Sharp v Thomson 1997 SC (HL) 66. At present someone buying
property can, in certain
circumstances, lose the property if a corporate seller becomes insolvent before the purchaser registers title to it. While the current law is satisfactory at protecting someone who purchases property against the risk that an individual seller might become insolvent, it is less satisfactory in the case of a corporate seller. With the aim of reducing the risk
where a company
sells property, the Report recommends that the rules be tightened - •
to ensure that buyers can readily find
out whether winding-up proceedings against a corporate seller have been initiated. |
|||||
|
|||||
18 |
|||||
|
|||||
|
||||||
SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT
2007 |
||||||
|
||||||
Damages for wrongful
death |
Our Discussion Paper, published
in August,
considered the issues for reform in each of these cases. It also invited views on the reform of the relatives' right to claim damages, on whether or not awards under section 1(4) of the Damages (Scotland) Act 1976 should be retained and, if so, what changes should be made to how they operate in practice. Following consultation on our
proposals, we are working on our report and draft Bill which will be published in the summer of 2008. |
|||||
|
Project Team |
|
||||
Professor Joe
Thomson, Commissioner Susan Sutherland, Project Manager Janet Hall, Legal Assistant |
||||||
When the Bill which became the
Rights of Relatives to Damages (Scotland) Act 2007 was being debated in the Scottish Parliament, Scottish Ministers concluded that some aspects of the law of damages for wrongful death merited further examination. As a consequence in September 2006 we were invited to undertake a review of the law and in particular the provisions of the Damages (Scotland) Act 1976. |
||||||
|
||||||
When a person is injured as a
result of the wrongful
actions of another, the injured party is usually entitled to some form of compensation for loss suffered, whether the loss is patrimonial (financial) or non-patrimonial (non-monetary such as the loss of expectation of life). Where the injured person dies as a result of the injuries, three possibilities arise: .
the victim may have raised proceedings
and
claimed compensation from the responsible person before death; •
the victim may die before proceedings
have been completed; and |
||||||
|
||||||
• |
the victim may die before raising
proceedings. |
|||||
|
||||||
19 |
||||||
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Joint
projects with the Law Commission |
parties.
The law says one thing, the FSA rules require another and the FOS reaches decisions based on a third. |
||||||
|
|||||||
Insurance
contract law |
The
Commissions' proposals distinguish between
business and consumer policyholders. For consumers, they largely reflect the FSA rules and FOS guidelines. A clear distinction is made between those who act deliberately or recklessly, those who act carelessly and those who act reasonably. Similar suggestions are made for business policyholders although for them the proposals would operate as a default regime. We aim to
publish a further consultation paper
around spring 2009. In that connection, we have recently published an Issues Paper on Insurable Interest. We will also be looking at damages for late payment, fraud and post-contractual good faith. Consumer
remedies |
||||||
|
Project Team |
|
|||||
Colin
Tyre QC, Commissioner Gillian Swanson, Project Manager Janet Hall, Trainee Solicitor |
|||||||
We are
assisting the Law Commission with this
project which they are carrying out under their Ninth Programme of Law Reform. Insurance law is
criticised as being outmoded and, in
some cases, unfair to policy holders. This project aims to modernise the law and make it fairer. Following a series
of Issues Papers (a means of
sharing initial thinking with interested parties), our joint Consultation Paper on Insurance Contract Law: Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach of Warranty by the Insured was published in July 2007. The consultation period ended in November. The response has been excellent and we are most grateful to all those who have taken the time to let us have their views. The
proposals largely focus on misrepresentation
and non-disclosure and explore the issues around what happens when claimants make mistakes in application forms or when they fail to mention facts which the insurer would regard as relevant. The
industry, aware that the Marine Insurance Act 1906 is outdated and inappropriate to a modern consumer market, has compensated with codes of practice. Regulation by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) and the dispute resolution service provided by the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) have also mitigated the harsh effects of the law. Whilst well intentioned, this is confusing for all |
|||||||
|
Project Team |
|
|||||
The
Hon Lord Drummond Young, Commissioner Gillian Swanson, Project Manager Maria Theodossiou, Legal Assistant |
|||||||
The
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform has asked us to look at simplifying the remedies which are available to consumers when they purchase goods which do not conform to contract because, for example, they are faulty. We have also been asked to look at remedies relating to the supply of goods. This is a joint project with the Law Commission for England and Wales. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
20 |
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
||
SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT
2007 |
||
|
||
This area
of law is unnecessarily complex due to an
overlap of domestic and EU remedies. One result of this complexity is that consumers, sales staff and trained consumer advisers find the law difficult to understand. The EU
Commission is currently carrying out a general review of consumer directives, including the Consumer Sales Directive which was implemented in the UK in 2002. As part of this project, the Department has asked us to advise it on any issues which appear to be of relevance to that review. Our aim will be to recommend appropriate remedies which make this area of the law easier for all users to understand and use. We plan to publish a joint consultation paper in the second half of 2008. |
||
|
||
21 |
||
|
||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Progress
on our law reform projects |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Projects under
our Seventh Programme |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT
2007 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Joint projects with the Law
Commission |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Consolidation |
Statute law
repeals |
||||||
|
|||||||
|
Project Team |
|
Project Team |
|
|||
|
|||||||
The
Hon Lord Drummond Young, Commissioner Susan Sutherland, Project Manager Cara Jardine, Legal Assistant |
The
Hon Lord Drummond Young, Commissioner Susan Sutherland, Project Manager Cara Jardine, Legal Assistant |
||||||
|
|||||||
One of
our statutory functions is to undertake work
on consolidation of legislation. Consolidation involves bringing together a number of statutes in an area of law into a single Act, with the aim of modernising the language and simplifying the provisions. Most of our consolidation work is undertaken jointly with the Law Commission and involves assisting in preparing a draft consolidation Bill. We are
assisting the Law Commission with work on a Bill to consolidate the legislation relating to representation of the people. Work is progressing on this substantial consolidation with the aim of producing an up to date Act on this area of electoral law. The Bill will reflect legislative changes in recent years, including those introduced by the Electoral Administration Act 2006. |
Another of our statutory
functions is to make
recommendations for the repeal of obsolete or otherwise unnecessary legislation. Along with consolidation, this work plays an important part in keeping legislation up to date and making it easier for people to use legislation. We
undertake work on statute law repeals jointly
with the Law Commission, undertaking consultation with appropriate bodies in relation to repeals that relate to Scotland. Work has
recently been completed on the Eighteenth Statute Law (Repeals) Report and draft Bill, which was published at the end of January 2008. The Bill covers a wide range of subjects including legislation relating to police, criminal law and town and country planning. The repeal candidates were developed through research by the Law Commission and consultation with appropriate bodies, including where appropriate bodies in Scotland. |
||||||
|
|||||||
Susan
Sutherland |
|||||||
|
|||||||
24 |
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||
SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT
2007 |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
An important part of our work
involves promoting law reform. Throughout the year we worked closely with the Law Commission on our joint projects and on matters of law reform generally. We provided comments on the Law Commission's provisional topics for inclusion in its tenth programme of law reform, which is due to start in April 2008. Some of the topics identified would be carried out jointly by the two Commissions. |
In July
the Chairman, Professor Maher and the Chief
Executive attended a joint meeting of the Law Commissions for Northern Ireland, England and Wales, Ireland and Scotland, in Dublin. In
September our Chief Executive represented the
Commission at the second biennial conference in Nairobi on "Encouraging International Cooperation on Law Reform". The conference was held in conjunction with the Commonwealth Law Conference on "Governance, Globalisation and the Commonwealth". We also
promote our work and an interest in law reform by attendance at law reform conferences and seminars. |
||
|
|||
Commissioners and
Chief Executive with three of the English Law Commissioners and Chief Executive during a joint meeting in Edinburgh in May 2007. |
|||
|
|||
We
maintained our close working relationship with
the Scottish Government and were pleased to welcome the Cabinet Secretary for Justice, Mr Kenny MacAskill who visited us in November. During
the year we participated in a number of international and other events aimed at fostering links between law reform agencies and encouraging an interest in law reform work. |
|||
|
|||
25 |
|||
|
|||
|
||
Discussion
Papers
• Liabilities of trustees to third parties
• Unincorporated associations
• Crown appeals
• Consumer remedies (jointly with the Law Commission)
Reports
• Crown appeals
• Damages for wrongful death |
||
|
||
|
||
26 |
||
|
||
|
|||
SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT
2007 |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
Commissioners
and staff
Commissioners The Hon
Lord James Drummond Young, Chairman Professor George Gretton Professor Gerry Maher QC Professor Joe Thomson Colin Tyre QC |
Legal
assistants
Lyndsey
Foggarty Cara Jardine Nicola McGowan Ross Sanderson Maria Theodossiou |
||
|
|||
Chief
executive
Michael
Lugton |
Librarian
Nick
Brotchie |
||
|
|||
Parliamentary
counsel
Gregor Clark
CB |
Office manager
Lesley
Young |
||
|
|||
Project
managers
John
Dods Charles Garland David Nichols Alastair Smith Susan Sutherland Gillian Swanson |
Personal
secretaries
Joan
Melville Heather Ryan |
||
Administrative and
typing
services staff Jackie
Palkowski Iain Ritchie Calum Robertson Gordon Speirs |
|||
Trainee
solicitor
Janet Hall |
|||
|
|||
27 |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
We thank
the members of our advisory groups
for their assistance with our law reform projects in 2007 Rape
and other sexual offences
Sandy Brindley, Rape Crisis
Scotland
James Chalmers, University of
Edinburgh
Brian Dempsey, Outright
Scotland
Iain Fleming
Solicitor
Janette de Haan, Glasgow
Women's Support Project
Tim Hopkins, Equality
Network
Louise Johnson, Scottish
Women's Aid
Frances McMenamin QC
Stephanie Whitehead,
Brook
Damages for wrongful
death
Professor Douglas Brodie,
University of Edinburgh
Laura Dunlop QC
Roderick Dunlop
Advocate
Gilles Graham
Solicitor
Maria Maguire QC
Harvey McGregor QC
Thomas Marshall
Solicitor
Land
registration
Professor Stewart Brymer
Solicitor
Professor Roderick Paisley, University of Aberdeen Professor Kenneth Reid, University of Edinburgh Professor Robert Rennie, University of Glasgow Personal injury
actions
Robert Carr
Solicitor
David Johnston QC
Ranald Macdonald, Scottish
Health Service Central
Legal Office
Robert Milligan
Advocate
Fiona Moore
Solicitor |
Trusts
Alan Barr Solicitor,
University of Edinburgh
Graham Burnside Solicitor
Robert Chill
Solicitor
Andrew Dalgleish
Solicitor
Frank Fletcher Solicitor
Alexander McDonald
Solicitor
Christopher McGill Society of Trust and
Estate
Practitioners (Scotland)
Simon A Mackintosh
Solicitor
James McNeill QC
Allan Nicolson Consultant
Solicitor
Professor Kenneth Norrie,
University of Strathclyde
Scott Rae Solicitor
Alister Sutherland Consultant
Solicitor
Succession
Alan Barr Solicitor,
University of Edinburgh
John Kerrigan Solicitor
Ross Macdonald, University of
Dundee
Christopher McGill, Society of
Trust and Estate
Practitioners (Scotland)
Iain Maclean Advocate
Professor Michael Meston,
University of Aberdeen
Malcolm Strang Steel
Solicitor
Eilidh Scobbie Solicitor
Scott Rae
Solicitor
Gordon Wyllie Solicitor
Insurance
law
Sarah P L Wolffe Advocate
Professor Angelo Forte, University of
Aberdeen |
||
|
|||
28 |
|||
|
|||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT
2007 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
Commission receives its funding from the Scottish Government. Our running
costs for 2007 were offset by payment received from Skills for Justice and the Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historic Monuments of Scotland for use of part of our office accommodation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Salaries
- Commissioners
(including national insurance contributions, superannuation payments and pensions to former Commissioners) Salaries
- Chief Executive and legal
staff
(including national insurance contributions, superannuation payments and consultants' fees and expenses) Salaries
- administrative
staff
(including national insurance
contributions
and superannuation
payments)
Accommodation
(including maintenance, rates and utilities)
Printing
and publishing
(including costs of books and
library purchases,
binding, machinery maintenance, photocopying, reprographic services and stationery) Telephone and
postage
Travel
and subsistence
Miscellaneous
(including training, office services and
hospitality)
Total |
£000
£000
585.5 |
£000
£000
542.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
564.5 |
570.1 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
176.5
1326.5 |
171.8
1283.9 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
49.8 |
60.3 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
91.6 |
94.8 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||
|
|||
Scottish
Law Commission
promoting law
reform |
|||
|
|||
Our law reform work
involves- |
|||
|
|||
|
Research
into the existing Scots law and review of comparative law
Analysis of
problems with the current
law
Development of
policies for
reform
Consultation
on proposed reforms
Consideration of
consultation responses
Review of policy
in the light of consultation
Publication of a
report to Ministers with recommendations for reform, including in most cases a draft Bill to implement the recommendations. Implementation of the recommendations in our reports requiring legislation is taken forward in the Scottish Parliament or in some cases in the UK Parliament at Westminster |
||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
For more information about
the Commission please contact:
Michael
Lugton, Chief Executive
Scottish
Law Commission
140
Causewayside Edinburgh EH9 1PR
Tel:
0131 668 2131
Fax:
0131 662 4900
E-mail:
info@scotlawcom.gov.uk
FOI
enquiries: FOI@scotlawcom.gov.uk
This report
is available on our website. It may also be purchased from TSO Scotland Bookshop. |
|||
|
|||
This
publication (excluding the Scottish Law Commission logo) may be re-used
free of charge in any format or medium
for research for non-commercial purposes, private study or for internal circulation within an organisation. This is subject to it being re-used accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the publication specified. For any
other use of this material please apply for a Click-Use Licence from the
Office of Public Sector Information (OPSI) website: www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/index.htm. |
|||
|
|||
Printed in the UK for The Stationery Office
Limited
On behalf of the Queen's Printer
for Scotland
C3 02/08 |
|||
|
|||
30 |
|||
|
|||