Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
Scottish Jury Court Reports
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Jury Court Reports >> Wilson's Trustees v. Bruce. [1828] ScotJCR 4_Murray_397 (9 January 1828)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotJCR/1828/4_Murray_397.html
Cite as: [1828] ScotJCR 4_Murray_397
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
SCOTTISH_HoL_JURY_COURT
Page: 397↓
(1828) 4 Murray 397
CASES TRIED IN THE JURY COURT, AT EDINBURGH, AND ON THE CIRCUIT, FROM DECEMBER 1825 TO JULY 1828.
No. 49
v.
PRESENT, LORDS CHIEF COMMISSIONER AND
Finding for the pursuers in a question of facility, circumvention, &c.
An action of reduction of a disposition on the ground of imbecility and facility, with fraud, circumvention, and lesion.
Defence.—A denial of imbecility or fraud.
“Whether it was not the deed of Wilson?”
Brown, for the pursuer.—Wilson was incapable of giving instructions for this deed, or of recollecting one clause of it while the other was reading. He was imbecile, but at times was obstinate.
Jeffrey, for the defender—If there was sufficient mind in this person to enable him to choose to whom his property should descend that is sufficient.
To prove handwriting, the witness should be examined as to his belief that it is genuine.
In the course of examining a witness as to handwriting,
Page: 398↓
The Lord Chief Commissioner observed,—If I were proving handwriting, I would ask the witness whether he knew the handwriting of the party—whether he ever saw him write—whether he had corresponded with him—and whether he believed the writing to be that of the party?
Moncreiff.—This is a case in which you have to balance the evidence; and the question is, whether the pursuer has made out his case?
Lord Chief Commissioner.—It is true that a person to be able to make a will does not require to have the same capacity as to manage a complicated transaction; but he must have competent understanding to know what is done, and the power of volition. This is not a case of compulsion or of fraud, but part of it has to do with a degree of art and management; and in deciding whether it is his deed, you must consider whether this person was so dealt with that he has not executed his volition. You will consider the character and credit of the witnesses, and give due weight to the facts they state. Great failure of sight and hearing does not incapacitate a person from making such a deed, but makes it peculiarly necessary that the person
Page: 399↓
You must consider and balance the evidence, and attend to the dates, and particularly to the documents, as, if you consider them pure and unsullied, they go far to counteract the evidence of the witnesses for the pursuer, who may have
Page: 400↓
Verdict—For the pursuers.
Counsel:
Moncreiff,
D. F., and M. Brown for the Pursuers.
Jeffrey, and Cuninghame, for the Defenders.
Solicitors: (Agents, John Campbell Jun, w. s. and William Waddell, w. s.)