OUTER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION
|
|
AD4/10
|
OPINION OF LORD PENTLAND
in the Petition of
INVERCLYDE COUNCIL Petitioners;
against
MT First Respondent;
and
MS Second Respondent:
in
An Application for a Permanence Order under section 80 of the Adoption and Children (Scotland) Act 2007 in relation to the child BMS
ญญญญญญญญญญญญญญญญญ________________
|
Petitioners: Sharpe; Simpson & Marwick
First Respondent: A McKay; Drummond Miller LLP
Second Respondent: Leighton; Balfour + Manson LLP
8 February 2011
[1] For
the reasons given in my Opinion in the petition relating to the child SMS, I
propose to make orders to the same effect in the present petition as regards
the child, BMS. My findings and reasons for making these orders are fully set
out in the petition relating to SMS and I need not repeat them here.