Page: 255↓
(Ante p.112, November 19th,1890.)
The Auditor reduced the fees sent to senior and junior counsel for discussion upon a reclaiming-note, from eight guineas and six guineas to six guineas and four guineas respectively. The Court approved of the Auditor's report— dub. Lord Trayner, who thought that for such a trifling difference the agents' discretion should not be interfered with.
The pursuers and reclaimers in this case were successful in the Inner House. Their agents had sent fees of £8, 8s. and £6, 6s. to senior and junior counsel respectively for the discussion upon the reclaiming-note. These fees the Auditor of Court reduced to £6, 6s. and £4, 4s. respectively.
The reclaimers lodged a note of objections to the Auditor's report, and argued that in such a small matter the Auditor should not have interfered with the agents' discretion, which had been properly exercised. The fees sent were quite reasonable in the circumstances.
At advising—
The Court approved of the Auditor's report, and allowed £2, 2s. to the respondents as expenses for the discussion.
Counsel for the Objectors— Salvesen. Agents— Smith & Mason, S.S.C.
Counsel for the Respondents— Wilson. Agents— J. & A. Peddie & Ivory, W.S.