Page: 775↓
[
John Mackin, a mason, was run over by one of the North British Railway Company's trains at a level-crossing near Stirling, and seriously injured. He raised an action of damages in the Court of Session against the railway company. Issues were adjusted, and the pursuer gave notice for trial at the next Circuit Court at Stirling. The Lord Ordinary ( M'Laren) reported the case to the Second Division on the motion of the defenders that the case should be tried in Edinburgh, on the grounds of convenience and saving of expense. It depended, they argued, on the duration of the criminal work at Circuit how long the witnesses might be kept waiting till the cause came on for hearing. There was, too, a danger of getting a biassed jury at Stirling, and a question of right-of-way at the place where the accident happened might arise. The pursuer opposed the motion on the ground that he was a poor man, and resident in Stirling, where also the witnesses lived and the accident happened. He argued that no ground had been shown for having the case tried in Edinburgh.
The Court refused the motion on the ground that no cause had been shown for granting it, and the pursuer was only exercising his legal right in giving notice for trial at the Circuit Court.
Counsel for Pursuer— M'Kechnie— M'Lennan. Agent— James M'Caul, S.S.C.
Counsel for Defenders— J. P. B. Robertson— Jameson. Agents— Millar, Robson, & Innes, S.S.C.