Page: 790↓
[
A steam-ship in the prosecution of her ordinary voyage came upon another steam-ship in a disabled condition through the breaking of her propeller-shaft, and succeeded, without much risk or danger to herself, in successfully towing the disabled vessel into her port of destination; the Court held the services so rendered to be of the nature of salvage, and in estimating the amount of remuneration due to the salvor, took into consideration the amount of freight she would have been earning for her owners had she not been detained in rendering these services, and the actual labour of the master and crew.
The steamship “Vulcan” sailed from Middles-borough on the 28th September 1881, bound for Flensburg in Schleswig-Holstein. On the following morning, while on the North Sea, she fell in with the steamship “Berlin” in a disabled condition, with her propellor-shaft broken and with signals of distress flying. The “Vulcan” proceeded to the assistance of the “Berlin,” and after considerable difficulty and trouble a tow rope was attached, and the disabled vessel was on the evening of the 29th September safely towed into Leith, the port of her destination. In addition to a miscellaneous cargo valued at about £11,000, the “Berlin” was carrying seventy-eight passengers in addition to her crew of twenty men.
The “Vulcan” thereafter resumed her course and proceeded on her voyage, and the present claim for £4000 in name of salvage, and as compensation for delay, and for services rendered, was made by the owners of the “Vulcan” against the owners of the “Berlin.”
The defenders were willing to meet any claims against the cargo (which was consigned to various persons) competent to the pursuers, but maintained that the services rendered were of the nature of towage, and not of salvage; and
Page: 791↓
that in any event the sum claimed was excessive. On the 14th March 1882 the Lord Ordinary ordained the defenders to make payment to the pursuers of the sum of £500, the amount tendered by the defenders, which sum his Lordship considered, after taking the proof and hearing the parties, to be sufficient remuneration for the services rendered.
The pursuers reclaimed, and argued—This was a case of salvage, and not merely of towage. The defenders' ship was in great danger, with her screw jammed, and provided with sails fit only to steady the ship but useless to enable her to make any headway. In fixing the amount the Lord Ordinary overlooked the number of human beings on board the salved ship, always an important element in determining the amount of salvage to be paid.
Authorities— Kenmure Castle, Feb. 17, 1882, L.R., 7 Prob. Div. 47; Arnold (“ Clenduror”), Feb. 1871, L.R., 3 P.C. App. 589; Maude and Pollock on Shipping, p. 660; Duncan v. Dundee Shipping Co., March 1878, 5 R. 742.
It was argued for the respondents—It is difficult to say whether this is a question of salvage or of towage only. The salvors incurred no risk, and at the time she was discovered there was no immediate danger to the salvors' vessel. The sum fixed by the Lord Ordinary was reasonable in the circumstances, seeing that the time occupied was only one day and the salved vessel was of moderate size.
Authorities— Strathnaver case, Dec. 1875, L.R., 1 App. Ca. 58; Glenduror case, Feb. 1871, 3 P.C. 589; Kenmure Castle, Feb. 17, 1882, 7 Prob. Div. 47; Maclachlan on Shipping, p. 619; Jones on Salvage.
At advising—
From one point of view the weather was certainly very favourable, for it seems to have been a dead calm when the “Vulcan” came up, but it was just that calm which rendered it impossible for the “Berlin” to make way in any direction. It is maintained on the one side that the “Berlin” was in very great peril, because with sails such as she had, and her propeller jammed, it was impossible for her to reach her destination, or indeed any port, as she was unable to make any headway.
The owners of the “Berlin,” on the other hand, say that she was not in so desperate a condition—that she could make headway sufficient to answer to her helm, and that if the weather had continued good she could have reached the port of her destination or gained some harbour on the English coast. It is impossible to deny that the “Berlin” was in considerable peril merely because there was no existing cause to produce immediate destruction or damage. She was at the mercy of the winds and waves, and on that account I think that when the “Vulcan” came to her assistance she performed salvage service in the proper sense of the word, which service falls to be estimated in the usual way. The value of the ship and its contents, its cargo and passengers, was considerable; but it is to be observed that the vessel was not of the largest size, and this must be taken into account, in fixing the amount to be paid for the assistance which was afforded to her. The services rendered were no doubt prompt and efficacious, but they were so rendered at no great labour, danger, or exposure to the saloons. The “Vulcan” was on a voyage from Middlesborough to Flensburg, and while so engaged she came upon this disabled vessel, so that we have not in the present case the incurring of any special risk on the part of the salving ship, nor any departure from her ordinary course, or the incurring of any danger from storms or otherwise in carrying assistance to the “Berlin.” The only risk that was run was that of the hawser breaking—a risk which always arises when a vessel which has not been built for the purpose, takes another in tow. But the time occupied by the salving vessel is an important, and perhaps the most important, element in the case, for the labour and skill required to bring the vessel into port seem not to have been very great; but I am far from saying that she did not do her best to bring the “Berlin” speedily into port. Now, the value of the time occupied by the “Vulcan” in assisting the “Berlin” may be arrived at in this way. Taken at its utmost, the time lost by the salving ship through rendering assistance to the “Berlin” was seven days. Now, what is the value of this period to the owners of the “Vulcan?” The freight she was to earn for her voyage from Middlesborough to Flensburg was £252, and the time occupied on the voyage was three and a-half days. Now, if we allow a reasonable time for loading and unloading, we find that eight days in all would be taken up in earning that amount, which on an average gives £31, 10s. per day. That sum multiplied by 7, the number of days occupied in accomplishing the salvage, gives us about £220, a little less than half the amount allowed by the Lord Ordinary. Now, this is the utmost that the owners can expect, and the question comes to be, whether the remainder of the sum awarded is a sufficient remuneration for the services of the master and crew? Now, looking to the small amount of labour and skill required, I think that the amount fixed by the Lord Ordinary is in the circumstances fair and reasonable, but even if I might have been disposed to have given a larger amount, supposing the case to have come before us in the first instance, I should be very unwilling to disturb the Lord Ordinary's interlocutor unless the sum which he had fixed was in my opinion entirely disproportionate to the
Page: 792↓
The Lords adhered.
Counsel for Pursuers and Reclaimers— Guthrie Smith—Keir. Agents— T. & W. A. M'Laren, W.S.
Counsel for Defenders and Respondents— Trayner— Dickson. Agents— Beveridge, Sutherland, & Smith, S.S.C.