Page: 500↓
[Sheriff Court of Lanarkshire.
In this action, which was raised in the Sheriff Court of Lanarkshire, the pursuer sought to obtain payment of a sum of money due as the rent of certain premises belonging to him which had been occupied by the defenders under an assignation by a certain William Bowes of his right to the said premises, as constituted by a lease from the pursuer by which assignees and sub-tenants were excluded. It was admitted that neither rent nor sub-rent had been paid for the period sued for, but from the evidence it appeared that there had been a tacit recognition of the defenders as tenants by the pursuer. The defenders pleaded that they were not tenants under the pursuer, and therefore not liable.
The Sheriff ( Clark), affirming the Sheriff-Substitute ( Spens), defender, for the sum sued for, and on appeal the Loads adhered.
Counsel for Appellant— Brand. Agent— W. Elliot Armstrong, S.S.C.
Counsel for Respondent— Hon. H. Moncreiff. Agents— Carment, Wedderburn, & Watson, W. S.