Page: 65↓
A woman was divorced from her husband on the ground of infidelity, and three co-defenders were found liable in the expenses of the action. Against the interlocutor granting decree of divorce the woman reclaimed, but the Court refused the note without calling on the respondents' counsel. Held that the woman was not entitled to her expenses in regard to the reclaiming note, the same having been utterly without ground.
Counsel for Pursuer — Campbell. Agents— White-Millar, Allardice, Robson, & Innes, W.S.
Counsel for Defender — Mair. Agent— B. Menzies, S.S.C.