Scottish Court of Session Decisions

This was a Special Case between John Guild, merchant in Dundee, William Brown, merchant, Port Dundas, Glasgow, and William Guild, merchant, Newburgh, Fifeshire, a majority of the trustees acting under the trust-disposition and settlement of the deceased William Guild, brickmaker, formerly of Whitevale, Glasgow, on the first part; and James Guild, farmer, Balgonebarns, near North Berwick, brother of the deceased, a liferenter and fiar, and also the only trustee acting under the said trust-disposition and settlement of the said William Guild, other than the parties of the first part; Marion Guild or Lear-month, wife of John Learmonth, Whitehouse Terrace, Edinburgh, with consent of the said John Learmonth, as her administrator-in-law, and for his interest; Janet Guild, residing in Great Western Road, Glasgow; and Beatrice Guild or Lyon, residing in Oakvale Terrace, Hillhead, Glasgow, widow of the late George Lyon, engineer, Glasgow, liferentrices under the provisions of the said trust-disposition and settlement of part of the estates of the said deceased William Guild, on the second part.

William Guild died on 2d January 1866, unmarried, leaving a trust-disposition and settlement, and two codicils, dated respectively 20th August 1861, 13th July 1863, and 21st December 1865. Marion Guild or Learmonth, Janet Guild, and Beatrice Guild or Lyon, were the only sisters of the truster, and were aged respectively sixty-one, sixty-four, and fifty. Mrs Learmonth had no children. Under the trust-disposition and settlement, the trustees were directed to hold the residue of the truster's means and estate for behoof of the parties therein mentioned, and divide the same, inter alia, to the extent of one-fifth to each of his sisters for their liferent use allenarly. Besides personal property, which was insufficient to pay his debts, the truster's estate consisted of heritable property at Camlachie, in the municipality of Glasgow, comprising feu-duties, dwelling-houses, and about 12 acres of land, in which there existed near the surface a thick stratum of clay. Part of these 12 acres had been let for the purpose of excavating the clay, and had been wrought by Mr Hodge, brickmaker, Glasgow, from 1845 to 1855. From 1855 to 1864 Mr Guild, the truster, wrought and used the clay in the said part of the 12 acres for brick-making; and, shortly before his death, but before the execution of the last codicil, he gave up brick-making, and let the clay in the said portion of the 12 acres to William Steven, brickmaker, Glasgow, for ten years from Candlemas 1865. The extent of this brick-field was about 15,000 sq. yards. Another part of the said 12 acres, extending to about 31,000 square yards, had been wrought as a clay-field from 1854, first by Hodge & Macdonald for about ten years, and afterwards by Hodge & Son, under a new arrangement made by the truster with them, for a lease of eleven years from Candlemas 1864. The arrangements above mentioned were made by binding missives between the truster and each of the tenants, but no formal lease had been executed prior to the truster's death. Formal leases were subsequently entered into between the trustees and the tenants in implement of the said missives. The lease to Messrs Hodge & Son provided for a fixed rent of £150 per annum, payable whether the clay was worked or not, with a lordship for all bricks made exceeding three tables or 1,650,000 bricks per annum, in the proportion which that number bears to the fixed rent of £150. Mr Steven's lease was in similar terms, the fixed rent being £120. The gross income of the residue of the estate was about £750 per annum, about £270 of which was derived from the brick-fields. The remainder was made up of house rents and feuduties. There were bonds over the property, and the nett income was about £400 per annum. The brick-fields were said to be steadily rising in value. The trustees had no power to sell any part of the heritable property till the testator's youngest nephew or niece alive should have attained twenty-one years, which could not be the case till December 1874. At the time of the testator's death, the fair value of the ground let to Mr Steven and Messrs Hodge & Son was £4600. Its present fair value was 6s. per sq. yard, subject to a deduction of thirty per cent., in consequence of the rubbish filled into the excavations not having as yet become sufficiently consolidated to sustain buildings. The truster was in the habit of furnishing returns to the lands valuation assessor, in which he stated the annual value of the brick-fields at the fixed rents payable by his tenants. The rents appeared in the valuation rolls as the annual value of the brick-fields, and on this valuation the testator paid taxes.

Down to the date of this case the liferentrices had been paid sums to account of their interest in the estate; but a question was raised as to whether they were entitled each to one-fifth of the whole clay rents, and, if not, what was the extent of their interests in the clay rents. The liferentrices claimed their proportion of the whole clay rents. The trustees were divided in opinion. Those unfavourable to the liferentrices' claim contended that they were only entitled to the interest of the clay rents, at the rate of five per cent. per annum.

In these circumstances, the opinion and judgment of the Court was requested on the following questions:—

“(1) Did the whole clay rents of the brick-fields form part of the annual income of the trust, divisible among the liferentrices to the extent of one-fifth each?”

And if this question should be answered in the negative,

“(2) To what proportion of the said rents were the liferentrices entitled?

M'Laren for the first parties.

Balfour for the second parties.

At advising—