Page: 380↓
This was an action of interdict against Mr Francis Smith, which depended on precisely the same question as waa involved in the preceding case. Mr Smith alleged that he had a right to angle because he had the written permission of Mr David Law, proprietor of Finnartmore, part of Mr Napier's feu from General Cam bell, and that Mr Law had acquired from Mr Rapier a right to angle. The case was disposed of in the same way as that against Mr Napier.
Counsel for pursuer— Dean of Faculty and Mr Adam. Agents— Adam, Kirk, & Robertson, W. S.
Counsel for Defender—Solicitor-General and Mr Crichton. Agents— D. Crawford and J. Y. Guthrie, S. S.C.