Page: 69↓
Jury Trial.
(Before
In a trial of an action for breach of promise of marriage, held (per Lord Kinloch) that a party could not ask a witness what he had been told by himself on a particular occasion.
In this case the following issue was sent to trial:—
“Whether, in or about the month of December 1865, the defender promised and engaged to marry the pursuer; and whether the defender has wrongfully failed to implement the said promise and engagement, to the loss, injury, and damage of the pursuer?”
Damages laid at £1000.
In the course of the evidence it was proposed by the counsel for the defender to ask one of his own witnesses what the defender had said to him on a particular occasion.
Millar for the pursuer ( Burnet with him) objected that the question was incompetent.
Gifford, for the defender ( Mair with him), urged that as the defender was not a competent witness in a breach of promise of marriage case, the evidence proposed should be allowed.
The jury, after an absence of three hours, returned a unanimous verdict for the pursuer; and by a majority of 9 to 3 assessed the damages at £50.
Solicitors: Agent for Pursuer— W. S. Stuart, S.S.C.
Agent for Defender— W. Officer, S.S.C.