Page: 141↓
Issues in an action by a master's trustees against his servant, in which it was alleged that the latter had uplifted money from bank for his master and failed to account for it.
The pursuers are the trustees and executors of the deceased Captain Ronald Macdonald, who resided in Portobello, and they sued the defender, Archibald Innes Munro, who was the captain's servant for twenty years before his death, for payment of £500, with interest since 28th July 1864, when Captain Macdonald died; and the summons concluded alternatively that “the defender ought and should be decerned and ordained to exhibit and produce before our said Lords a full and particular account of the whole sums of money received by him for or on account of the said Ronald Macdonald, or delivered and entrusted to him by the said Ronald Macdonald between 2d May and 28th July 1864, and of the application of the said sums, whereby the true balance due by him to the said Ronald Macdonald at the time of his death may appear and be ascertained.” This was followed by a conclusion for payment of the said balance.
It appeared that Captain Macdonald had by his settlement, executed in April 1864, left to the defender his wearing apparel and a legacy of £100; and after looking into the deceased's affairs his trustees found that there had been drawn from his account at the Royal Bank in Portobello, betwixt 2d May 1864 and 8th July 1864, four sums amounting to; £6oo. It was averred by the pursuers that these sums had all been drawn by the defender, and that the deceased had no occasion for so much money for his own use, because he was bedridden from April until his death in July; at all events, that at the utmost he did not require for his own uses more than £150. It was also averred (Cond. 8), “Of the said sums the defender retained and still retains £450 or thereby, and the said sums so retained belonged to the said Ronald Macdonald, and now belong to the pursuers.” And also (Cond. 14), “The defender intromitted with the said sums drawn as aforesaid. He made certain small payments out of these sums, but he never accounted for these sums to the deceased. If he handed the monies drawn from bank by any of said cheques to the deceased, he afterwards obtained possession of these monies to be held for behoof of the deceased, and he now retains possession thereof.” The defence to the action is that although the defender was occasionally sent to the bank for money, he always instantly handed over the same to his master to be disposed of at his pleasure. There was no averment or plea that the money or any part of it had been gifted to the defender by the deceased; but before adjusting issues to-day, the pursuers minuted that they consented to the question of donation, if raised at the trial, being tried under the issues.
The pursuers proposed an issue putting the simple question whether the defender uplifted the four different sums, and is resting-owing to the pursuers the sum of £450, part thereof, with interest. They founded upon the cases of Mackenzie v. Brodie, 19th March 1859 ( 21 D. 804), and Byres v. Forbes, 5th December 1865, in which cases issues had been adjusted in similar terms.
The Court thought the case was a very peculiar one, and should be tried under two issues, which were adjusted in the following terms:—
“I. It being admitted that at the dates after-mentioned the defender was a servant in the employment of the said deceased Ronald Macdonald—Whether, of the dates after-mentioned, the defender, by virtue of cheques granted by the said deceased Ronald Macdonald on his account with the Royal Bank of Scotland, uplifted from the branch of that bank at Portobello the following sums—viz.,
On or about 2d May 1864
£150
On or about 12th May 1864
200
On or about 2d July 1864
50
On or about 8th July 1864
200
£600
And whether the defender failed to account for, and is resting-owing to the pursuers, the sum of £450, part of the said sums, with interest since 28th July 1865, or any part thereof?
“II. It being admitted that during the period after-mentioned the defender was a servant in the employment of the said deceased Ronald Macdonald—Whether, during the period between 1st May and 28th July 1864, the defender obtained from the said deceased Ronald Macdonald part of the sums drawn under the said cheques, and amounting to £450, or any part thereof, for behoof of the said deceased, and whether the defender retains and is resting-owing to the pursuers the said sum of £450, or any part thereof, with interest since 28th July 1864?”
Counsel for Pursuers— Mr Clark and Mr Shand. Agent— Mr J. T. Mowbray, W.S.
Counsel for Defender— Mr Gifford and Mr Deas. Agent— Mr John Robertson, S. S. C.