Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Lords found, that a tenant was not entitled to cut sea-ware for the manufacture of kelp, although the lease gave him the lands, with “parts, pendicles, and universal pertinents thereof, used and wont,” and although a proof was offered, that he and the former tenant had been in use to cut and manufacture the sea-ware.
Fol. Dic. v. 4. p. 326.
*** This case is No. 26. p. 9646. voce Part and Pertinent.
