If you found BAILII useful today, could you please make a contribution?
Your donation will help us maintain and extend our databases of legal information. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month donates, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Subject_1 MEMBER of PARLIAMENT. Subject_2 DIVISION VI.
Summary Complaint to the Court of Session.
Subject_3 SECT. II.
Upon what grounds is a Complaint admitted.
Sir William Dunbar v. Sir James Sinclair
Date: 2 February 1790 Case No. No 248.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Sir William Dunbar and others gave in a summary complaint against a judgment of the freeholders of Caithness, for having refused to strike Sir James Sinclair off the roll, though he had succeeded to the peerage of Caithness. The Lords found the complaint competent, and allowed the complainers to bring proof of their allegation.
Fol. Dic. v. 3. p. 433. Fac. Col.
*** This case is No 108. p. 7395. voce Jurisdiction.