[1789] Mor 5354
Subject_1 HEIR CUM BENEFICIO.
Date: John Syme
v.
Douglas, Heron, and Company
15 January 1789
Case No.No 25.
It is competent to prove resting owing by the oath of an heir served upon inventory.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
General Gordon of Kingsgrange employed Mr John Syme, writer to the signet, as his agent. After the General's death, his heir made up titles cum beneficio inventarii to these lands, which were sold judicially.
In the ranking of the creditors, Mr Syme claimed a considerable sum for business done by him for General Gordon. As, however, before any demand was made, more than three years had elapsed from the date of the last article of his account, Mr Syme offered to prove, by the oath of the heir, that the whole was still resting owing.
Douglas, Heron, and Company, who were creditors to General Gordon, objected to this claim. And
Pleaded; An heir served cum beneficio inventarii is merely a trustee for the creditors of the ancestor, and so cannot be considered as the debtor, to whom, in virtue of the statute, 83d Parl. 1579, a judicial reference may be made. A contrary doctrine would be attended with very mischievous consequences, as it would thus be in the power of an heir, after possessing himself of the whole documents belonging to the ancestor, to rear up, in collusion with those who had been formerly creditors to him, many groundless claims.
Answered; An heir served cum beneficio, although obliged, in accounting with the creditors of the ancestor, to conduct himself as a trustee, is truly proprietor of the ancestor's estate, in the same way as if he had made up titles without any limitation. In like manner, although he is not liable to the creditors of the ancestor beyond the value of the estate, he is still debtor to them; and to his oath, therefore, a reference may be made in virtue of the statute of 1579. Where the claim, as in the present case, was unprescribed at the ancestor's death, this is evidently just; for the debt of the ancestor having been unpaid at his death, must be understood as still due, if not discharged by the heir.
The Lords were clearly of opinion, That so far as the claim had not undergone the statutory limitation at the decease of General Gordon, the allegation of resting owing might be proved by the oath of the heir, though served cum beneficio inventarii.
The Lord Ordinary had disallowed the claim.
But, after advising a reclaiming petition with answers, the Court altered that judgment.
Lord Ordinary, Ankerville. Act. Daluell. Alt. Blair. Clerk, Home.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting